69
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effect of legislation (CLIA'88) on setting quality specifications for US laboratories

Pages 563-567 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Belk WP, Sunderman FW. A survey of the accuracy of chemical analysis in clinical labora-tories. Am J Clin Pathol 1947; 17: 853–61. Reprinted in Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988; 112: 320 — 6.
  • Dorsey DB. The evolution of proficiency testing in the USA. In: Proceedings of Second National Conference on Proficiency Testing. Bethesda, MD: Information Services, 1975: 8–9.
  • US Department of Health, Education and Wel-fare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1967. Part f, Title III, PHS §353.
  • US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Social Security Administration, 1968. Federal health insurance for the aged. Regulations for coverage of service of independent labora-tories. DHEW Publ. No. HIR–13.
  • Public Law 100 578, Section 353 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 263a) October 31, 1988.
  • US Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs: regula-tions implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA). Final rule. Fed Regist 1992; 57: 7002–186.
  • CLIA'88 update. Hyperlink http://www.hcfa.gov/ medicaid/clia/cliahome.htm.
  • Laessig RH, Ehrmeyer SS, Leinweber JE. Health Care financing Administration's new proficiency testing rules: characterizing long term performance as "successful", "probation" and "suspended". Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116: 770–6.
  • Ehrmeyer SS, Laessig RH, Leinweber JE, Oryall JJ. The 1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory per-formance characteristics (CV-bias) needed to pass. Clin Chem 1990; 36: 1736–40.
  • Westgard JO, Bawa N, Ross JW, Lawson NS. Laboratory precision performance: State of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments proficiency testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996; 120: 621–5.
  • Westgard JO. The QC debate heats up. Hyperlink http://www.westgard.com.
  • Fraser CG. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in clinical chemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 112: 404 — 15.
  • Hyltoft Peterson P, Ricos C, Stockl D, Libeer J-C, Baadenhuijsen H, Fraser CG, Thienpont L. Proposed guidelines for the internal quality control of analytical results in the medical laboratory. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem ; 3: 983— 99.
  • Ehrmeyer SS, Burmeister BJ, Laessig RH, Hassemer DJ. Laboratory performance in a state proficiency testing program: what can a labor-atorian take home? J Clin Immunoassay 1994; 17: 223— 30.
  • CLIA Updates. Health Care Financing Adminis-tration, Baltimore, MD. 1999.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.