Attendance at surveillance endoscopy of patients with adenoma or colorectal cancer

References

• Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 10–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Stewart E, O'Brien MJ. The natural history of colorectal cancer. Opportunities for intervention. Cancer 1991; 67(Suppl 4)1143–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morson BC. The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1984; 35: 425–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 1009–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, Jr, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 653–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Langmark F, Majak BM, Vatn MH. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 414–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 901–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagengast FM, Kaandorp CJ. Revised CBO guideline “Follow-up after polypectomy”. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145: 2022–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruinvels DJ, Stiggelbout AM, Klaassen MP, Kievit J, Dik J, Habbema F, et al. Follow-up after colorectal cancer: current practice in The Netherlands. Eur J Surg 1995; 161: 827–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neijt JP, Welvaart K. Consensus follow-up study after surgery for colonic or rectal carcinoma. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1988; 132: 1400–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groenen MJ, Kuipers EJ, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Fockens P, Ouwendijk RJ. Computerisation of endoscopy reports using standard reports and text blocks. Neth J Med 2006; 64: 78–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen MJM, Hirs W, Becker H, Kuipers EJ, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Fockens P, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopic terminology coding (GET-C): A WHO-approved extension of the ICD-10. Dig Dis Sci in press.
   Google Scholar
• Post PN, Kuipers EJ, Meijer GA. Declining incidence of peptic ulcer but not of its complications: a nation-wide study in The Netherlands. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:1587–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morson BC. Genesis of colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol 1976; 5: 505–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin TR, Conell C, Shapiro JA, Chazan SG, Nadel MR, Selby JV. Complications of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 1786–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, Aste H, Bonelli L, Crosta C, et al. Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “once-only sigmoidoscopy”–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1763–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zapka JG, Lemon SC, Puleo E, Estabrook B, Luckmann R, Erban S. Patient education for colon cancer screening: a randomized trial of a video mailed before a physical examination. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 683–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 264–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comprehensive cancer centre. Guidelines for colorectal carcinoma; www.oncoline.nl. 2001. Ref Type: Internet Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Harst EV. Follow-up na resectie van niet familiaire colorectale carcinomen; Wat is er evidence-based? IKR Bull 2003;17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 1: CD002200
   Google Scholar
• Ovaska JT, Jarvinen HJ, Mecklin JP. The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989; 24: 416–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm B, Schwenk W, Hucke HP, Stock W. Does methodic long-term follow-up affect survival after curative resection of colorectal carcinoma?. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 280–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf KB, Warren JL, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 563–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar