Variations in colonoscopy practice in Europe: A multicentre descriptive study (EPAGE)

References

• Lieberman DA, de Garmo PL, Fleischer DE, Eisen GM, Helfand M. Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 619–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?. Gut 2004; 53: 277–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton PB, Connor P, McGee D, Jowell P, Nickl N, Schutz S, et al. Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 352–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results from a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 161–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy HE, Hennessy E, Connor P, Rhodes B, Patchett SE, Farthing MJG, et al. Changing patterns of sedation use for routine out-patient diagnostic gastroscopy between 1989 and 1998. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 217–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rex DK. Colonoscopy turning the focus on quality [commentary]. Digest Liver Dis 2002; 34: 831–2
   Google Scholar
• Gorard DA, McIntyre AS. Completion rate to caecum as a quality measure of colonoscopy in a district general hospital. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 243–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 827–30
   Google Scholar
• Keats A. The ASA classification of physical status: a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 233–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vader JP, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Bochud M, Gonvers JJ. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): project and methods. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 572–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1004–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich F, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ, et al. Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an international observational study (EPAGE). Endoscopy 2006; 38: 461–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M, Janatuinen E, Julkunen R. Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 566–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Postic G. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 554–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F, Terreni N, Minoli G. Routine versus “on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 169–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipe BW, Rex DK, Latinovich D, Overley C, Kinser K, Bratcher L, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 815–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuss LT, Inauen W. The dawning of a new sedative: propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Digestion 2004; 69: 20–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1797–802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppertz-Hauss G, Bretthauer M, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Kjellevold O, Majak B, et al. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 537–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Ekborn A, Blomqvist P. Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Digest Liver Dis 2005; 37: 113–8
   Google Scholar
• Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Hannuksela H, Ekborn A, Blomqvist P. The impact of endoscopists’ experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 511–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall JB. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 287–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D. The variation phenomenon in 1994 [editorial]. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1017–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell RMS, McCallion K, Gardiner KR, Watson RGP, Collins JSA. Successful colonoscopy; completion rates and reasons for incompletion. Ulster Med J 2002; 71: 34–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fasih T, Varma JS, Tabaqchali MA. Prospective audit of quality of colonoscopy in a surgical coloproctology unit. Surgeon 2004; 2: 107–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fasoli R, Repaci G, Comin U, Minoli G. A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Digest Liver Dis 2002; 34: 833–41
   Google Scholar
• Denis B, Weiss AM, Peter A, Bottlaender J, Chiappa P. Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2004; 28: 1245–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karajeh MA, Sanders DS, Hurlston DP. Colonoscopy in elderly people is a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield: a prospective comparative study of 2000 patients. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 226–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2784–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harewood GC. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50: 47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, the SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Study Group. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: re-evaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 2001;15:251–61.
   Google Scholar
• Church JM. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 556–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoli G, Meucci G, Prada A, Terruzzi V, Bortoli A, Gullotta R, et al. Quality assurance and colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 522–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas-Gibson S, Thapar C, Shah SG, Saunders BP. Colonoscopy at a combined district general hospital and specialist endoscopy unit: lessons from 505 consecutive examinations. J R Soc Med 2002; 95: 194–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 964–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 620–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church J. Complications. Colonoscopy: principles and practice, JD Waye, DK Rex, CB Williams. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, OxfordUK 2003; 170–82
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, Olsen J. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 72–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar