Intestinal Adaptation after Massive Proximal Small-Bowel Resection in the Pig

References

• Hanson WR. Proliferative and morphological adaptation of the intestine to experimental resection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1982; 17 Suppl 74:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson RCN, Chir M. Intestinal adaptation (first of two parts). Structural, functional and cytokinetic changes. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1393–402.
   Google Scholar
• Booth CC, Evans KT, Menzies T, Street DF. Intestinal hypertrophy following partial resection of the small bowel in the rat. Br J Surg 1959;46:403–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves M, Smith MW, Williamson RC. Increased activity of digestive enzymes in ileal enterocytes adapting to proximal small bowel resection. Gut 1987;28:981–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson WR, Osborne JW, Sharp JG. Compensation by the residual intestine after intestinal resection in the rat. I. Influence of amount of tissue removed. Gastroenterology 1977;72:692–700.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson WR, Osborne JW, Sharp JG. Compensation by the residual intestine after intestinal resection in the rat. II. Influence of postoperative time interval. Gastroenterology 1977;72:701–5.
   Google Scholar
• Weser E, Hernandez MH. Studies of small bowel adaptation after intestinal resection in the rat. Gastroenterology 1971;60: 69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman EJ, Dowling RH, McNaughton J, Peters TJ. Effects of oral versus intravenous nutrition on intestinal adaptation after small bowel resection in the dog. Gastroenterology 1976;70: 712–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouttebel MC, Astre C, Girardot PM, Saint-Aubert B, Joyeux H. Clinical, biological, and histological follow-up during intestinal adaptation after small-bowel resection in the dog. Eur Surg Res 1991;23:333–40.
   Google Scholar
• Swaniker F, Guo W, Fonkalsrud EW, Brown T, Newman L, Ament M. Adaptation of rabbit small intestinal brush-border membrane enzymes after extensive bowel resection. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1000–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porus RL. Epithelial hyperplasia following massive small bowel resection in man. Gastroenterology 1965;48:753–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling RH, Booth CC. Functional compensation after small-bowel resection in man. Lancet 1966;455:146–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lo CW, Walker WA. Changes in the gastrointestinal tract during enteral or parenteral feeding. Nutr Rev 1989;47:193–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller ER, Ullrey DE. The pig as a model for human nutrition [review]. Annu Rev Nutr 1987;7:361–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigalet DL, Lees GM, Aherne F, Van AJ, Fedorak RN, Keelan M. The physiology of adaptation to small bowel resection in the pig: an intecrated study of morphology and functional changes. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:650–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance RA, Wilkinson AW. Experimental resection of the intestine in newborn pigs. Br J Nutr 1967;21:731–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlqvist A. Assay of intestinal disaccharidases. Anal Biochem 1968;22:99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randal J. Protein measurements with the folin phenol reagent. J Biochem 1951; 193:265–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lenter C, editor. Geigy scientific tables. Vol. 2. Basel, Switzerland: Geigy; 1982. p. 198.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 1984;133,4:1710–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattoretti G, Becker MHG, Key G, Duchrow M, Schlüter C, Galle J, et al. Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Pathol 1992;168: 357–63.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling RH, Booth CC. Structural and functional changes following small intestinal resection in the rat. Clin Sci 1967;32: 139–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JS, Quigley EMM, Adrian TE. Response of the terminal ileum to intestinal resection and bypass. Transplant Proc 1996;28:2590–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BL, Thompson JS, Quigley EMM. Effect of extent of resection on intestinal muscle adaptation. J Surg Res 1996;61: 147–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder DE, Manners MJ. The level and distribution of carbo-hydrases in the small intestine mucosa of pigs from 3 weeks of age to maturity. Br J Nutr 1980;43:141–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuboi KK, Kwong LK, D’Harlingue AE, Stevenson DK, Kerner JA, Sunshine P. The nature of maturational decline of intestinal lactase activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985;840:69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MW. Expression of digestive and absorptive function in differentiating enterocytes [review]. Annu Rev Physiol 1985;47: 247–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban E, Starr PE, Michel AM. Morphologic and functional adaptations of large bowel after small-bowel resection in the rat. Dig Dis Sci 1983;28:265–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar