Laboratory surveillance of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Denmark 1988 – 2007

References

• The Danish notification system for communicable diseases. National Board of Health, J. no. 1508-1-93. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mordhorst, CH. Studies on oculogenital TRIC agents isolated in Denmark. Am J Ophthalmol 1967;63((Suppl)):1282–8.
   Google Scholar
• Page, LA. Revision of the family Chlamydiaceae Rake (Rickettsiales) unification of the psittacosis-lymphogranuloma venereum-trachoma group of organisms in the genus Chlamydia. Jones, Rake, and Stearns 1945. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966;16:223–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ripa, KT. Microbiological diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Infection 1982;10((Suppl 1)):S19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Scheibel, JH, Kristensen, JK, Mordhorst, CH. Chlamydia trachomatis in gonococcal and non-gonococcal urethritis. Ugeskr Laeger 1980;142:879–81. (In Danish with summary in English.)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heisterberg, L. Pelvic inflammatory disease following induced first-trimester abortion. Risk groups, prophylaxis and sequelae. Dan Med Bull 1988;35:64–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Møller, BR, Mårdh, P-A, Ahrons, S, Nüssler, E. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in patients with acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Dis 1981;8:198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPI-News 1991;49 (in Danish), 1993;21 (in Danish), 1995;08 (in Danish), 1995;38, 1996;38, 1997;46, 1999;05, 1999;24, 2000;38, 2001;38, 2002;51, 2003;48, 2004;45, 2005;34, 2006;20, 2007;19, 2008;20. Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.ssi.dk/sw1204.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, DT, Wasserheit, JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect 1999;75:3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, JK, Andersen, B, Olesen, F, Østergaard, L. Reasons for Chlamydia trachomatis testing and the associated age-specific prevalences. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2003;63:339–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, H, Lindbäck, J, Ripa, T, Arneborn, M, Ramstedt, K, Ekdahl, K. Is the increase in notifications of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Sweden the result of changes in prevalence, sampling frequency or diagnostic methods?. Scand J Infect Dis 2002;34:28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennedsen, M, Nygård, B, Berthelsen, L, Jensen, JS, Lind, I. Prevalence of chlamydia in a group of randomly selected young men. Ugeskr Laeger 2001;163:4583–6. (In Danish with summary in English.)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen, B, Olesen, F, Møller, JK, Østergaard, L. Population-based strategies for outreach screening of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a randomized, controlled trial. J Infect Dis 2002;185:252–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Østergaard, L, Andersen, B, Olesen, F, Møller, JK. Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomized study. Br Med J 1998;317:26–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard, L, Andersen, B, Møller, JK, Olesen, F. Home sampling versus conventional swab sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women: a cluster-randomized 1-y follow-up study. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:951–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brule, AJC, Munk, C, Winther, JF, Kjaer, SK, Jørgensen, HO, Meijer, CJLM, , et al. Prevalence and persistence of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in urine specimens from Danish male military recruits. Int J STD AIDS 2002;13((Suppl 2)):19–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, WC. Epidemiology of chlamydial infection: are we losing ground?. Sex Transm Infect 2008;84:82–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, N. Screening programmes for chlamydial infection: when will we ever learn?. Br Med J 2007;334:725–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, B, Østergaard, L, Møller, JK, Olesen, F. Effectiveness of a mass media campaign to recruit young adults for testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of home obtained and mailed samples. Sex Transm Infect 2001;77:416–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, B, Østergaard, L, Puho, E, Skriver, MV, Schønheyder, HC. Ectopic pregnancies and reproductive capacity after Chlamydia trachomatis positive and negative test results: a historical follow-up study. Sex Transm Dis 2005;32:377–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, M, Low, N, Smith, GD, Lindblom, B, Herrmann, B. Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: ecological analysis. Br Med J 1998;316:1776–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, LA, Scoular, A, Hart, G, Reid, M, Wilson, P, Goldberg, DJ. What is the excess risk of infertility in women after genital chlamydia infection? A systematic review of the evidence. Sex Transm Infect 2008;84:171–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett, GP. How much infertility does chlamydia cause?. Sex Transm Infect 2008;84:157–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Audit Group in Genitourinary Medicine. Clinical guidelines and standards for the management of uncomplicated genital chlamydia infection. Health Education Authority, Great Britain 1997:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lau C-Y, Qureshi, AK. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sex Transm Dis 2002;29:497–502.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridgway, GL. Treatment of chlamydial genital infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;40:311–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar