Nonlinear model predictive control for yaw rate and body motion control through semi-active and active suspensions

References

• Ueno K, Fujibayashi T, Sasaki M, et al. Vehicle control techniques for safety, environmental performance, and ride comfort. Hitachi Rev. 2018;67(1):64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Saveresi SM, Poussot-Vassal C, Spelta C, et al. Semi-active suspension control for vehicles. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng HE, Hrovat D. State of the art survey: active and semi-active suspension control. Veh: Syst Dyn. 2015;53(7):1034–1062. doi:10.1080/00423114.2015.1037313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricco M, Zanchetta M, Rizzo GC, et al. On the design of yaw rate control via variable front-to-total anti-roll moment distribution. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2020;69(2):1388–1403. doi:10.1109/TVT.2019.2955902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Taheri S, Tian S, et al. A novel semi-active suspension design based on decoupling skyhook control. J Vibroeng. 2014;16(3):1318–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadir ZA, Hudha K, Jamaluddin H, et al. Active roll control suspension system for improving dynamics performance of passenger vehicle. Proc Int Conf Model Identif Control. 2011: 492–497.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Shu W, Du D, et al. Semi-active suspension of a full-vehicle model based on double-loop control. Procedia Eng. 2011;16:428–437. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.1107.
   Google Scholar
• Samin PM, Jamaluddin HJ, Rahman RA, et al. Semi-active suspension for ride improvement using stability augmentation system control algorithm. J Mek. 2008;26:86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenaga S, Lewis FL, Campos J, et al. Active suspension control of ground vehicle based on a full-vehicle model. Am Control Conf. 2000;6:4019–4024.
   Google Scholar
• Chokor A, Talj R, Doumiati M, et al. A global chassis control system involving active suspensions, direct Yaw control and active front steering. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;52(5):444–451. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.071.
   Google Scholar
• Na J, Huang Y, Pei Q, et al. Active suspension control of full-car systems without function approximation. IEEE Trans Mechatron. 2020;25(2):779–791. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2019.2962602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvai-Soos D, Horn M. New level of vehicle comfort and vehicle stability via utilisation of the suspensions anti-dive and anti-squat geometry. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(7):1002–1027. doi:10.1080/00423114.2017.1378818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleps-Dezasse M, Büntze T, Svaricek F, et al. LPV feedforward control of semi-active suspensions for improved roll stability. Contr Eng Pract. 2018;78:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani A, Bagheri A, Azadi S. Integrated vehicle dynamics control using semi-active suspension and active braking systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K: J Multi-Body Dyn. 2017;232(3):314–329.doi:10.1177/146441931773318.
   Google Scholar
• Dahmani H, Pagès O, El Hajjaji A. Observer-based state feedback control for vehicle chassis stability in critical situations. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech. 2016;24(2):636–643.doi:10.1109/TCST.2015.2438191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Wong PK, Ma X, et al. Chassis integrated control for active suspension, active front steering and direct yaw moment systems using hierarchical strategy. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(1):72–103. doi:10.1080/00423114.2016.1245424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokor A, Talj R, Doumiati M, et al. Effect of roll motion control on vehicle lateral stability and avoidance. Am Control Conf. 2020: 4868–4875.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper N, Crolla D, Levesley M. Integration of active suspension and active driveline to ensure stability while improving vehicle dynamics. SAE Tech. Paper 2005-01-0414. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sorniotti A, D’Alfio N. Vehicle dynamics simulation to develop an active roll control system. SAE Tech Paper 2007-01-0828. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Her H, Suh J, Yi K. Integrated control of the differential braking, the suspension damping force and the active roll moment for improvement in the agility and the stability. Proc IMechE Part D: J Autom Eng. 2015;229(9):1145–1157. doi:10.1177/0954407014550502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her H, Koh Y, Joa E, et al. An integrated control of differential braking, front/rear traction, and active roll moment for limit handling performance. IEEE Trans Veh Tech. 2016;65(6):1071–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termous H, Shraim H, Talj R, et al. Coordinated control strategies for active steering, differential braking and active suspension for vehicle stability, handling and safety improvement. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(10):1494–1529. doi:10.1080/00423114.2018.1521001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan M, Pi D, Li Y, et al. The design of anti-roll moment distribution for dual-channel active stabilizer bar system. Chin Control Decis Conf. 2018: 6301–6308.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Ahmadian M, Sun R. Improving vehicle lateral stability based on variable stiffness and damping suspension system via MR damper. IEEE Trans Veh Tech. 2014;63(3):1071–1078. doi:10.1109/TVT.2013.2282824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie MO, Hac A. Closed loop yaw control of vehicles using magneto-rheological dampers. SAE Tech Paper 2000-01-0107. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lu SB, Li YN, Choi SB, et al. Integrated control on MR vehicle suspension system associated with braking and steering control. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49(1-2):361–380. doi:10.1080/00423110903401889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DE, Haddad WM. Nonlinear control of roll moment distribution to influence vehicle yaw characteristics. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 1995;3(1):110–116. doi:10.1109/87.370716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DE, Haddad WM. Active suspension control to improve vehicle ride and handling. Veh Syst Dyn. 1997;28(1):1–24. doi:10.1080/00423119708969346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Lv G, Qv M, et al. Lateral stability control based on the roll moment distribution using a semiactive suspension. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automob Eng. 2017;231(12):1627–1639. doi:10.1177/0954407016681386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho W, Suh J, You SH. Integrated motion control using a semi-active damper system to improve Yaw-roll-pitch motion of a vehicle. IEEE Access. 2021;9:52464–52473. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070366.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wilson DA, Xu W, et al. Integrated vehicle ride and steady-state handling control via active suspensions. Int J Veh Des. 2006;42(3-4):306–327. doi:10.1504/IJVD.2006.010435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wilson DA, Xu W, et al. Active suspension control to improve vehicle ride and steady-state handling. 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and European Control Conference. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lakehal-Ayat M, Diop S, Fenaux E. An improved active suspension yaw rate control. Am Control Conf. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco M, Percolla A, Rizzo GC, et al. On the model-based design of front-to-total anti-roll moment distribution controllers for yaw rate tracking. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;60(2):569–596. doi:10.1080/00423114.2020.1825753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houska B, Ferrau HJ, Diehl M. An auto-generated real-time iteration algorithm for nonlinear MPC in the microsecond range. Automatica (Oxf). 2011;47(10):2279–2285. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2011.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen M, Canale M, Sename O, et al. A model predictive control approach for semi-active suspension control problem of a full car. IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shao S, Zhou H, Liu H. Distributed model predictive control and implementation for vehicle active suspensions. IFAC-PapersOnline. 2018;51:961–966. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.10.056.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Wong PK, Zhao J, et al. Design and testing of a nonlinear model predictive controller for ride height control of automotive semi-active air suspension systems. IEEE Access. 2018;6:63777–63793. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohrle C, Wagner A, Schindler A, et al. Active suspension controller using MPC based on a full-car model with preview information. Am Control Conf. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gohrle C, Schindler A, Wagner A, et al. Design and vehicle implementation of preview active suspension controllers. IEEE Trans Contr Sys Tech. 2014;22(3):1135–1142. doi:10.1109/TCST.2013.2272342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai VN, Yoon DS, Choi SB, et al. Explicit model predictive control of semi-active suspension systems with magneto-rheological dampers subject to input constraints. J Intell Material Syst Struct. 2020;31:1157–1170. doi:10.1177/1045389X20914404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theunissen J, Sorniotti A, Gruber P, et al. Regionless explicit model predictive control of active suspension systems with preview. IEEE Trans Ind Electr. 2020;67(6). doi:10.1109/TIE.2019.2926056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song S, Wang J. Incremental model predictive control of active suspensions with estimated road preview information from a lead vehicle. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr. 2020;12:142–150. doi:10.1115/1.4047962.
   Google Scholar
• Jurisch M. Vertical trajectory planning: an optimal control approach for active suspension systems in autonomous vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(11):3788–3809. doi:10.1080/00423114.2021.1979238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Ayalew B. Predictive roll handling and ride control of vehicles via active suspensions. Am Control Conf. 2014: 2102–2107.
   Google Scholar
• Adireddy G, Shim T. MPC based integrated chassis control to enhance vehicle handling considering roll stability. ASME Dyn Syst Control Conf. 2011;2:877–884.
   Google Scholar
• Dalboni M, Tavernini D, Montanaro U, et al. Nonlinear model predictive control for integrated energy-efficient torque-vectoring and anti-roll moment distribution. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2021;26(3):1212–1224. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2021.3073476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang S, Lee B, Park Y, et al. Integrated chassis control for improving on-center handling behavior. SAE Int J Passeng Cars – Mech Syst. 2014;7(3):1002–1008. doi:10.4271/2014-01-0139.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhao Y, Lin F, et al. Integrated control for distributed in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle based on state estimations and nonlinear MPC. Proc IMechE Part D: J Autom Eng. 2022;236(5):893–906. doi:10.1177/09544070211030444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe Intelligent Suspension Driv Tenneco Automotive BVBA. https://www.monroeintelligentsuspension.com/electronic/pages/products.php, last accessed on 7 November 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zanten AT. Bosch ESP systems: 5 years of experience. SAE Trans: J Pass Cars. 2000;109(7):428–436. doi:10.4271/2000-01-1633.
   Google Scholar
• Shino M, Nagai M. Yaw-moment control of electric vehicle for improving handling and stability. JSAE Rev. 2001;22(4):473–480. doi:10.1016/S0389-4304(01)00130-8.
   Google Scholar
• Koibuchi K. Behavior control system of vehicle distinctive of oversteered and understeered conditions. Patent US5702165A. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• https://www.avl.com/documents/10138/2095827/AVL+VSM+4%E2%84%A2+-+Solution+Brochure, last accessed on 18 Aug. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Armengaud E, et al. EVC1000–integrated corner solution for innovative electric vehicles. 8th Transp Res Arena (TRA). 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Metzler M, Tavernini D, Gruber P, et al. On prediction model fidelity in explicit nonlinear model predictive vehicle stability control. IEEE Trans Contr Sys Technol. 2021;29(5):1964–1980. doi:10.1109/TCST.2020.3012683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon JC. Suspension geometry and computation. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard M. Roll centres and jacking forces in independent suspensions – A first principles explanation and a designer’s toolkit. SAE Tech Paper 1999-01-0046. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Pacejka H. Tyre and vehicle dynamics. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Antonov S, Fehn A, Kugi A. Unscented Kalman filter for vehicle state estimation. Veh: Syst Dyn. 2011;49(9):1497–1520. doi:10.1080/00423114.2010.527994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzilli V, Ivone D, De Pinto S, et al. On the benefit of smart tyre technology on vehicle state estimation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(11):3694–3719. doi:10.1080/00423114.2021.1976414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen BC, Hsieh FC. Sideslip angle estimation using extended Kalman filter. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46:353–364. doi:10.1080/00423110801958550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chindamo D, Lenzo B, Gadola M. On the vehicle sideslip angle estimation: a literature review of methods, models, and innovations. App Sc. 2018;8(3):1–20. doi:10.3390/app8030355.
   Google Scholar
• Melzi S, Sabbioni E. On the vehicle sideslip angle estimation through neural networks: numerical and experimental results. Mech Syst Sign Proc. 2011;25(6):2005–2019. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Du H, Lam J, et al. A novel observer design for simultaneous estimation of vehicle steering angle and sideslip angle. IEEE Trans Ind Elec. 2016;63(7):4357–4366. doi:10.1109/TIE.2016.2544244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne L, Pannek J. Nonlinear model predictive control. London, Dordrecht Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreau HJ. qpOASES User’s Manual, April 2017, https://www.coin-or.org/qpOASES/doc/3.2/manual.pdf, last accessed on 06 June 2023.
   Google Scholar