A robust alternative to the Lilliefors test of normality

References

• Maronna RA, Martin RD, Tohai VJ, et al. Robust statistics, theory and methods (with R). 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Wiley; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Thode HC. Testing for normality. New York (USA): Marcel Dekker; 2002. (Statistics: Textbooks and Monographs).
   Google Scholar
• Stehlík M, Střelec L, Thulin M. On robust testing for normality in chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2014;130:98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW. Methods for testing statistical differences between groups in medical research: statistical standard and guideline of life cycle committee. Life Cycle. 2022;2:1–8. doi: 10.54724/lc.2022.e1
   Google Scholar
• Orcan F. Parametric or non-parametric: skewness to test normality for mean comparison. Int J Assess Tools Educ. 2020;7(2):255–265. doi: 10.21449/ijate.656077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52(3-4):591–611. doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross J, Ligges U. Package ‘nortest: Tests for Normality’, R package version 1.0-4; 2015. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nortest.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1900;50(302):157–175. doi: 10.1080/14786440009463897
   Google Scholar
• Cramér H. On the composition of elementary errors. First paper: mathematical deductions. Scand Actuar J. 1928;1928(1):13–74. doi: 10.1080/03461238.1928.10416862
   Google Scholar
• Von Mises R. Wahrscheinlichkeit, statistik und wahrheit. Vol. 3. Wien: Springer; 1928.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson T, Darling DA. A test of goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1954;49(268):765–769. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62(318):399–402. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Francia RS. An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. J Am Stat Assoc. 1972;67(337):215–216. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1972.10481232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarque CM, Bera AK. Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Econ Lett. 1980;6(3):255–259. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarque CM, Bera AK. A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int Stat Rev / Revue Internationale De Stat. 1987;55(2):163–172. doi: 10.2307/1403192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Agostino R, Pearson ES. Testing for departures from normality. I. Fuller empirical results for distribution of b2 and b1. Biometrika. 1973;60(3):613–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman KO, Shenton LR. Omnibus test contours for departures from normality based on b1 and b2. Biometrika. 1975;62(2):243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urzúa CM. On the correct use of omnibus tests for normality. Econ Lett. 1996;53(3):247–251. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(96)00923-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel YR, Gastwirth JL. A robust modification of the Jarque–Bera test of normality. Econ Lett. 2008;99(1):30–32. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croux C, Dhaene G, Hoorelbeke D. Testing the information matrix equality with robust estimators. J Stat Plan Inference. 2006;136(10):3583–3613. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2005.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brys G, Hubert M, Struyf A. A robust measure of skewness. J Comput Graph Stat. 2004;13(4):996–1017. doi: 10.1198/106186004X12632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brys G, Hubert M, Struyf A. Goodness-of-fit tests based on a robust measure of skewness. Comput Stat. 2008;23(3):429–442. doi: 10.1007/s00180-007-0083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel YR, Miao W, Gastwirth JL. Robust directed tests of normality against heavy-tailed alternatives. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2007;51(5):2734–2746. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coin D. Testing normality in the presence of outliers. Stat Methods Appl. 2008;17(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s10260-007-0046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Barrio E, Cuesta-Albertos JA, Matrán C, et al. Tests of goodness of fit based on the l2-Wasserstein distance. Ann Stat. 1999;27(4):1230–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Esteban PC, Del Barrio E, Cuesta-Albertos JA, et al. Assessing when a sample is mostly normal. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2010;54(12):2914–2925. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov A. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. Giornale dell'Istituto Italiano degli Attuari. 1933;4:83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov N. Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann Math Stat. 1948;19(2):279–281. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177730256
   Google Scholar
• Massey Jr FJ. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1951;46(253):68–78. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallal GE, Wilkinson L. An analytic approximation to the distribution of Lilliefors's test statistic for normality. Am Stat. 1986;40(4):294–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iman RL. Graphs for use with the Lilliefors test for normal and exponential distributions. Am Stat. 1982;36(2):109–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw PJ, Debruyne M, Engelen S, et al. Robustness and outlier detection in chemometrics. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2006;36(3-4):221–242. doi: 10.1080/10408340600969403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croux C, Rousseeuw PJ. A class of high-breakdown scale estimators based on subranges. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1992;21(7):1935–1951. doi: 10.1080/03610929208830889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui W, Gel YR, Gastwirth JL. Lawstat: an R package for law, public policy and biostatistics. J Stat Softw. 2008;28(3):1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.i03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlík M, Fabián Z, Střelec L. Small sample robust testing for normality against pareto tails. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2012;41(7):1167–1194. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2012.625849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw P, et al. Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. New York: Wiley; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino RB, Stephens MA. Goodness-of-fit-techniques. Boca Ratón: CRC Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson R, MacKinnon JG. Graphical methods for investigating the size and power of hypothesis tests. Manchester Sch. 1998;66(1):1–26. doi: 10.1111/manc.1998.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar