Modified Therapeutic Community Treatment for Offenders with MICA Disorders: Substance Use Outcomes

REFERENCES

• De Leon G. The Therapeutic Community: Theory, Model, and Method. New York: Springer, 2000; 1–472.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler HK. Evaluation of prison substance abuse treatment programs: Outcome studies and methodology. In Prison-Based Treatment Programs in America. Early K, ed. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1995; 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Sacks JY, McKendrick K, Banks S, Stommel J. Modified TC for MICA offenders: Crime outcomes. Beh Sci Law 2004; 22:477–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast ML, Hall EA, Wexler HK. Multiple measures of outcome in assessing a prison-based drug treatment program. In Treating Substance Abusers in Correctional Contexts: New Understandings, New Modalities. Pallone NJ, ed. New York: Haworth Press, Inc., 2003; 65–94.
   Google Scholar
• Field G. The cornerstone program: A client outcome study. Federal Probation 1985; 49:50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin CA, Hooper RM, Harrison LD. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. J Drug Issues 1997; 27:261–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin CA. Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime & Delinquency 2004; 50:88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SS, Butzin CA, Saum CA, Inciardi JA. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: from prison to work release to aftercare. The Prison Journal 1999; 79:294–320.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast ML, Hall EA, Wexler HK, Melnick G, Cao Y. Amity prison-based therapeutic community: 5-year outcomes. The Prison Journal 2004; 84:36–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler HK, Williams R. The “Stay'n Out” therapeutic community. J Psychoactive Drugs 1986; 18(3):221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler HK, Falkin GP, Lipton DS. Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1990; 17(1):71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler HK, Melnick G, Lowe L, Peters J. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal 1999A; 79(3):321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler HK, De Leon G, Thomas G, Kressel D, Peters J. The Amity prison evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and behavior 1999B; 26(2):147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzin CA, Martin SS, Inciardi JA. Evaluating component effects of a prison-based treatment continuum. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 22:63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller ML, Knight K, Simpson DD. Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addict 1999; 94(6):833–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight K, Simpson DD, Hiller ML. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal 1999; 79(3):337–351.
   Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Petrila J. Introduction: Co-occurring disorders in the criminal justice system. Behavioral Sciences & The Law 2004; 22:427–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Pearson FS. Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders in offenders: Approaches, findings and recommendations. Federal Probation 2003; 67:32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton DS, Pearson FS, Cleland CM, Yee D. The effects of therapeutic communities and milieu therapy on recidivism: Meta-analytic findings from the Correctional Drug Abuse Treatment Effectiveness (CDATE) study. In Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-Offending. McGuire J, ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2003; 39–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks S, Sacks JY, Stommel J. Modified TC for MICA inmates in orrectional settings: A program description. Corrections Today 2003; Oct:90–99.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Therapeutic Community Research (CTCR). CTCR Baseline Interview Protocol©. New York, NY: National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Norusis MJ. SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR. Varieties of Criminal Behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1982; 1–321.
   Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Hills HA. Intervention Strategies for Offenders with Co-Occurring Disorders: What Works? Delmar, NY: The GAINS Center, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen FT, Gendreau P. Assessing correctional rehabilitation: policy, practice, and prospects. In Criminal Justice 2000: Policies, Practices, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. Vol 3. Washington, D.C.: Office of Justice Programs, 2000; 109–175.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry TP, Krohn M. The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice. Duffee D, ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 2000; 33–83.
   Google Scholar
• Glaze LE. Probation and Parole in the United States, 2002. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 2003; 1–8.
   Google Scholar