127
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identifying Combinations of Altmetrics and Web of Science Usage That Linked to Early Citations of an Article Received: A Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA)

ORCID Icon, , , , &

References

  • Altmetric (n.d). What are altmetrics? https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/
  • Arts, B., & de Koning, J. (2017). Community forest management: An assessment and explanation of its performance through QCA. World Development, 96, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.014
  • Ayoub, F., Case, R., Ouni, A., Ladna, M., Shah, H., & Morelli, G. (2019). Should original research be shared on social media? Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score with article citations in gastroenterology and hepatology research. Gastroenterology, 156(6), S-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(19)39632-5
  • Banshal, S. K., Singh, V. K., & Muhuri, P. K. (2021). Can altmetric mentions predict later citations? A test of validity on data from ResearchGate and three social media platforms. Online Information Review, 45(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2019-0364
  • Batooli, Z., Mohamadloo, A., & Nadi-Ravandi, S. (2021). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites in article-level: The case of Iranian researchers’ “top papers” in clinical medicine. Library Hi Tech, 39(4), 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2020-0319
  • Bhardwaj, R. K. (2017). Academic social networking sites: Comparative analysis of Researchgate, Academia.edu, Mendeley and Zotero. Information and Learning Science, 118(5/6), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0012
  • Bol, D., & Luppi, F. (2011). Systematizing the test for necessary conditions in QCA: An introduction to the maximization. ECPR General Conference.
  • Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2018). Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data. PLOS One, 13(5), e0197133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197133
  • Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003
  • Boyd, C. J., Ananthasekar, S., Kurapati, S., & King, T. W. (2020). Examining the correlation between Altmetric Score and citations in the plastic surgery literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 146(6), 808e–815e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007378
  • Capano, G., & Pritoni, A. (2020). Exploring the determinants of higher education performance in Western Europe: A qualitative comparative analysis. Regulation & Governance, 14(4), 764–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12244
  • Capatina, A., Micu, A., Micu, A. E., Bouzaabia, R., & Bouzaabia, O. (2018). Country-based comparison of accommodation brands in social media: An fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.017
  • Chen, W. M. Y., Bukhari, M., Cockshull, F., & Galloway, J. (2020). The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: A bibliometric study. Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 59(2), 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez163
  • Chi, P.-S. (2020). The field-specific citation and usage patterns of book literature in the Book Citation Index. Research Evaluation, 29(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz037
  • Cho, J. (2021). Altmetrics of highly cited research papers in social science. Serials Review, 47(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2021.1882652
  • Choi, K., & Cho, J. K. (2018). Exploring fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to health-related OECD data. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(6), 4415–4422.
  • Clarivate (n.d). Web of Science Platform. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/webofscience-platform/
  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015a). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003–2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309
  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015b). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 260–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2014-0173
  • Cui, Y. X., Fang, Z. C., & Wang, X. W. (2021). Article promotion on Twitter and Facebook: A case study of Cell journal. Journal of Information Science, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211059772
  • Del Sarto, N., Isabelle, D. A., & Di Minin, A. (2020). The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA analysis of Italian startups. Technovation, 90–91, 102102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102102
  • Devers, K. J., Lallemand, N. C., Burton, R. A., Kahwati, L., McCall, N., Zuckerman, S. (2013). Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to study patient-centered medical homes. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/using-qualitative-comparative-analysis-qca-study-patient-centered-medical-homes
  • Ebrahimy, S., Mehrad, J., Setareh, F., & Hosseinchari, M. (2016). Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2130-z
  • EC3Metrics (2018). Periodic table of scientometric indicators. http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/notas/tabla-periodica-de-indicadores/
  • Eldakar, M. A. M. (2019). Who reads international Egyptian academic articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley readership categories. Scientometrics, 121(1), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03189-7
  • Elsevier (2020). Scopus content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf
  • Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012
  • Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. (2020). The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00313-1
  • Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
  • Garcovich, D., Zhou Wu, A., Sanchez Sucar, A.-M., & Adobes Martin, M. (2020). The online attention to orthodontic research: An Altmetric analysis of the orthodontic journals indexed in the journal citation reports from 2014 to 2018. Progress in Orthodontics, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00332-6
  • Gerrits, L., & Pagliarin, S. (2021). Social and causal complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Strategies to account for emergence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1799636
  • Gligor, D., & Bozkurt, S. (2020). FsQCA versus regression: The context of customer engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101929
  • Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Amyot, D., & Peters, I. (2014). Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? IT - Information Technology, 56(5), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2014-1048
  • Hayon, S., Tripathi, H., Stormont, I. M., Dunne, M. M., Naslund, M. J., & Siddiqui, M. M. (2019). Twitter mentions and academic citations in the urologic literature. Urology, 123, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.041
  • Huarng, K.-H., & Yu, T. H.-K. (2017). Using qualitative approach to forecasting regime switches. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 2035–2048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0338-x
  • Jeong, J. W., Kim, M. J., Oh, H. K., Jeong, S., Kim, M. H., Cho, J. R., Kim, D. W., & Kang, S. B. (2019). The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology. Colorectal Disease: The Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 21(10), 1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14719
  • Kong, L., & Wang, D. (2020). Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 101095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101095
  • Kopper, A., Westner, M., & Strahringer, S. (2020). From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT: A qualitative comparative analysis to determine configurations for successful management of IT by business entities. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 18(2), 209–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-020-00472-6
  • Kumbure, M. M., Tarkiainen, A., Luukka, P., Stoklasa, J., & Jantunen, A. (2020). Relation between managerial cognition and industrial performance: An assessment with strategic cognitive maps using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 114, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.001
  • Lee, S. S.-Y. (2014). Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Epidemiology and Health, 36, e2014038. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014038
  • Lo, F. Y., Rey-Marti, A., & Botella-Carrubi, D. (2020). Research methods in business: Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 115, 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.003
  • Luc, J. G. Y., Archer, M. A., Arora, R. C., Bender, E. M., Blitz, A., Cooke, D. T., Hlci, T. N., Kidane, B., Ouzounian, M., Varghese, T. K., & Antonoff, M. B. (2021). Does tweeting improve citations? One-year results from the TSSMN prospective randomized trial. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 111(1), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065
  • Maggio, L. A., Leroux, T. C., Meyer, H. S., & Artino, A. R. J. (2018). #MedEd: Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(4), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-018-0438-5
  • Maier, C., Mattke, J., Pflügner, K., & Weitzel, T. (2020). Smartphone use while driving: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of personality profiles influencing frequent high-risk smartphone use while driving in Germany. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102207
  • Markusova, V., Bogorov, V., & Libkind, A. (2018). Usage metrics vs classical metrics: Analysis of Russia’s research output. Scientometrics, 114(2), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2597-2
  • Mostaghel, R., & Oghazi, P. (2017). Elderly and technology tools: a fuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1969–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0390-6
  • Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2017). Robustness tests for quantitative research. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ouchi, A., Saberi, M. K., Ansari, N., Hashempour, L., & Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A. (2019). Do altmetrics correlate with citations? A study based on the 1,000 most-cited articles. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2019-0050
  • Palamar, J. J., & Strain, E. C. (2021). News and social media coverage is associated with more downloads and citations of manuscripts that focus on substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 218, 108357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108357
  • Parente, T. C., & Federo, R. (2019). Qualitative comparative analysis: Justifying a neo-configurational approach in management research. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0089
  • Patak, A. A., Naim, H. A., & Hidayat, R. (2016). Taking Mendeley as multimedia-based application in academic writing. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.6.4.890
  • Pattyn, V., & Bouterse, M. (2020). Explaining use and non-use of policy evaluations in a mature evaluation setting. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00575-y
  • Pekovic, S., & Rolland, S. (2020). Recipes for achieving customer loyalty: A qualitative comparative analysis of the dimensions of customer experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102171
  • Poveda, A. C., & Martínez, C. I. P. (2013). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): An application for the industry. Quality & Quantity, 47(3), 1315–1321.
  • Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. M. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874
  • Pruditsch, N. (2017). The conditions of successful renewable energy governance: Exploring qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in energy policy research. Energy Procedia, 118, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.004
  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In C. C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and beyond (pp. 190–212). University of Chicago Press.
  • Rey-Martí, A., Felício, J. A., & Rodrigues, R. (2017). Entrepreneurial attributes for success in the small hotel sector: a fuzzy-set QCA approach. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 2085–2100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0466-3
  • Richardson, M. A., Bernstein, D. N., & Mesfin, A. (2021). Manuscript characteristics associated with the altmetrics score and social media presence: An analysis of seven spine journals. The Spine Journal: Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, 21(4), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.001
  • Rihoux, B. (2003). Bridging the gap between the qualitative and quantitative worlds? A retrospective and prospective view on qualitative comparative analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03257690
  • Rihoux, B., & De Meur, G. (2009). Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA.) In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Rihoux, B., & Marx, A. (2013). QCA, 25 years after “the comparative method” mapping, challenges, and innovations—Mini-Symposium. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 167–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912468269
  • Roberts, M. C., Murphy, T., Moss, J. L., Wheldon, C. W., & Psek, W. (2018). A qualitative comparative analysis of combined state health policies related to human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 108(4), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304263
  • Romero, J., Lafont, J., Tafur, J., & Eguren, S. (2016). Performance and value creation at United Kingdom’s airports using fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1442–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.122
  • Saberi, M. K., & Ekhtiyari, F. (2019). Usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations of LIS highly cited papers: An altmetrics study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 20(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2018-0025
  • Sathianathen, N. J., Lane, R., Condon, B., Murphy, D. G., Lawrentschuk, N., Weight, C. J., & Lamb, A. D. (2020). Early online attention can predict citation counts for urological publications: The #UroSoMe_Score. European Urology Focus, 6(3), 458–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.015
  • Scarpi, D., Russo, I., Confente, I., & Hazen, B. (2021). Individual antecedents to consumer intention to switch to food waste bioplastic products: A configuration analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.006
  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2013). Doing justice to logical remainders in QCA: Moving beyond the standard analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912468269h
  • Shin, H. C., Yu, D. J., Park, S., Anderies, J. M., Abbott, J. K., Janssen, M. A., & Ahn, T. K. (2020). How do resource mobility and group size affect institutional arrangements for rule enforcement? A qualitative comparative analysis of fishing groups in South Korea. Ecological Economics, 174, 106657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106657
  • Skarmeas, D., Leonidou, C. N., & Saridakis, C. (2014). Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1796–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.010
  • Smith, Z. L., Chiang, A. L., Bowman, D., & Wallace, M. B. (2019). Longitudinal relationship between social media activity and article citations in the journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 90(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.028
  • Thelwall, M. (2019). Do Mendeley reader counts indicate the value of arts and humanities research? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617732381
  • Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLOS One, 8(5), e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
  • Thelwall, M., & Nevill, T. (2018). Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.008
  • Thomson-Reuters (2015). Web of Science “item level usage metrics” - Available 26 September. https://wok.mimas.ac.uk/news/2015/20150925.html
  • Tonia, T., Van Oyen, H., Berger, A., Schindler, C., & Künzli, N. (2016). If I tweet will you cite? The effect of social media exposure of articles on downloads and citations. International Journal of Public Health, 61(4), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0831-y
  • Tornberg, H. N., Moezinia, C., Wei, C., Bernstein, S. A., Wei, C., Al-Beyati, R., Quan, T., & Diemert, D. J. (2021). Assessing the dissemination of COVID-19 articles across social media with Altmetric and PlumX metrics: Correlational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e21408. https://doi.org/10.2196/21408
  • Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Donche, V., & Struyf, E. (2022). Leadership as a lever for inclusive education in Flanders: A multiple case study using qualitative comparative analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220953608
  • Vilchez-Roman, C., Huaman-Delgado, F., & Alhuay-Quispe, J. (2021). Social dimension activates the usage and academic impact of Open Access publications in Andean countries: A structural modeling-based approach. Information Development, 37(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920901849
  • Waltman, L., & Costas, R. (2014). F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A comparison with citations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23040
  • Wang, P. L., Williams, J., Zhang, N., & Wu, Q. (2020). F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: An exploratory study of four journals. Scientometrics, 122(2), 933–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03302-w
  • Wang, Z. Q., Glänzel, W., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science: An analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicators. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03612-4
  • Wasike, B. (2021). Citations gone #social: Examining the effect of Altmetrics on citations and readership in communication research. Social Science Computer Review, 39(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319873563
  • Wei, M., & Noroozi, C. A. (2020). Evaluating the relationship between the academic and social impact of open access books based on citation behaviors and social media attention. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2401–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03678-0
  • Wei, M., Quan, W., Sadhana, M., & Russell, S. (2023). Research on differential and interactive impact of China-led and US-led open-access articles. Journal of Information Science, 49(1), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551521998637
  • Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research: Theory, methods and practice. Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.