Clinical relevance of distortion product emissions by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

References

• Avan P, Bonfils P. Frequency specifity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1993;32:12–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown AM, Kemp DT. Supppressibility of the 2fl—f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984;13:129–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centor RM. Signal detectability: The use of ROC curves and their analyses. Med Decis Making 1991;11: 102–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman BM, Beauchaine KL, Kaminski JR, Peters J, Schulte L, Jestedt W. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:2639–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:220–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Probst R, Harris FP. The clinical use of oto-acoustic emissions of cochlear distortion products. Laryngorhinootologie 1991;70:123 —31.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson AR. Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequence: a primer for receiver operating charac-teristic curve analysis. Ann Clin Biochem 1993;30: 521–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DO, Paparello M, Jung MD, Smurzinski J, Sun X. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: Performance regarding sensitivity, specifity and receiver operating characteris-tics. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 fl—f2 distortion-product otoa-coustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;98: 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Lind 0. Alternative distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss in a clinical population. Scand Audiol 1999;28: 257–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin BL, Harris FP, Stagner BB, Hawkins MD, Martin GK. Distortion-product emissions in humans: I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1990;236: 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lusted LB. Signal detectability and medical decision-making. Science 1971;171:1217–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Schenin SA, Coats AC. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin by supression contours and pure-tone exposures. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol 1987; 28:191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Bera JC, Collet L. Disortion product otoacoustic emisssions and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1994;33:305–26.
   Google Scholar
• Probst R, Harris FP. Transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Comparison of results from normally hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head-Neck-Surg 1993;119: 858–60.
   Google Scholar
• Schlögel H, Stephan K, Boheim K, Welzl-Muller K. Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss. HNO 1995;43: 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Suckföll M, Schneeweiss S, Dreher A, Schorn K. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240:1285–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner W, Plinkert PK. The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999;256:177–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emis-sions. J Acoust Soc Am, 1995;98:3200–14.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley MP, Davies CM, Stevens JC. Use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to detect and monitor cochlear damage caused by platinum-containing drugs. Br J Audiol 1998;32:305–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
   Google Scholar