A "virtual hearing aid" for comparing hearing aids in children: a double-blind crossover study

References

• Allan JB, Hall JL, Jeng PS. Loudness growth in octave bands (LGOB) — a procedure or the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:745–53.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen T, Pedersen F, Parving A, Lyregaard PE. Procedure for clinical testing of hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1998;27:249–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. Clinical assessment of modern hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1998;27\(Suppl. 49):50–3.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S, Billermark E, Öberg M, Lunner T, Hellgren J. Clinical trail of a digital hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1998;27:51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S, Gatehouse S, Bentler RA, et al. Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996;17(Suppl.):87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Biering-Sorensen M, Riess H, Boisen G, Parving A. A clinical comparative investigation of a non-linear versus linear hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1995;24:125–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bille M, Jensen AM, Kjaerbol E, Vesterager V, Sibelle P, Nielsen H. Clinical study of a digital vs. an analogue hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1999;28:127–35.
   Google Scholar
• Boymans M, Dreschler WA, Schoneveld P, Verschuure H. Clinical evaluation of a full digital in-the-ear hearing instrument. Audiology 1999;38:99–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. Maturation of hearing aid benefit: subjective and objective measurements. Ear Hear 1992;13:131–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler WA, Verschuure J. Psychophysical evalua-tion of fast compression systems. In: Kollmeier B, ed. Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids. Singapore: World Scientific, 1996, pp. 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel B, Albani S, Kollmeier B. Audiologische Erfolgskontrolle von digitalen Hörgerdteanpassungen. Zeitschr Audiol 1999;138:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Outcome measures for hearing aid evaluation - properties and requirements in acclimati-zation research. Ear Hear 1996;17\(Suppl. 3):265–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection on frequency responses for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1993;4:296–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes DE, Cormier KL. Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aid users. Scand Audiol 2000;29:10–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes LE. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1999;10:26–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naylor G. Technical and audiological factors in the implementation and use of digital signal processing hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1997;26:223–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson P, Vesterager V, Sibelle P, Sieck L, Christen-sen B. A double-blind cross-over study of a non linear hearing aid. Audiology 1997;36:325–38.
   Google Scholar
• Parving A, Sorensen MS, Carver K, Christensen B, Sibelle P, Vesterager V. Hearing instruments and health technology - an evaluation. Scand Audiol 1997;26: 231–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen AN, Olsen SO, Borgkvist BY, Nielsen LH: Long-term test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling in normal-hearing subjects using pure-tone stimuli. Scand Audiol 1998;27:161–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T, Bentler R. The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:2281–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz PG, Kopun J, Mace AL, Lewis DE. Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech. Ear Hear 1996;17:520–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz PG, Kopun J, Mace A, Lewis DE, Nittrouer S. The perception of amplified speech by listeners with hearing loss: acoustic correlates. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;98:1388–99.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz PG, Dalzell S, Peterson D, Kopun J, Lewis DL, Hoover BE. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids. Ear Hear 1998;19:131–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz PC. Hearing aid outcome measures for children. J Am Acad Audiol 1999;10:14–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valente M, Sammeth CA, Potts LG, Wynne MK, Wagner-Escobar M, Coughlin M. Differences in performance between Oticon MultiFocus Compact and Re-Sound BT2-E hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8: 280–93.
   Google Scholar
• Valente M, Fabry DA, Potts LG, Sandlin RE. Compar-ing the performance of the Widex SENSO digital hearing aid with analogue hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:342–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verschuure J, van Benthem PPG. Effect of hearing aids on speech perception in noisy situations. Audiology 1992;31:205–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar