The latency of evoked otoacoustic emissions: Its relation to hearing loss and auditory evoked potentials

References

• de Boer E. Synthetic whole-nerve action potentials for the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1975;58:1030–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown D, Kimberley B, Eggermont J. Cochlear traveling-wave delays estimated by distortion-product emissions in normal hearing adults and term-born neonates. J Otolaryngol 1994;23:234–8
   Google Scholar
• Dau T, Wegner 0, Mellert V, Kollmeier B. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:1530–40
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont JJ. Analysis of compound action potential responses to tone bursts in the human and guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1976;60:1132–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont JJ, Don M. Analysis of click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;68:1671 —5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C. Action potentials along the cochlear partition recorded from the ear canal in man. Scand Audiol 1974;3:13–9
   Google Scholar
• Engdahl B, Arnesen AR, Mair IVVS. Otoacoustic emissions in the first year of life. Scand Audiol 1994; 23:195–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoth S. Veränderungen der friihen akustisch evozierten Potentiale bei Akustikusneurinom. HNO 1991;39:343 — 55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoth S, Lochmann H. Dual Response Audiometry: A time-saving technique for enhanced objective auditory assessment. Audiology 1999;38:235–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986;22:95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT, Brown AM. A comparison of mechanical nonlinearities in the cochleae of man and gerbil from ear canal measurements. In Klinke R and Hartmann R, eds. Hearing: Physiological bases and psychophysics. Heidelberg: Springer, 1983;82–8
   Google Scholar
• Kimberley BP, Brown DK, Eggermont JJ. Measuring human cochlear traveling wave delay using distortion product emission phase responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:1343 —50
   Google Scholar
• Kruglov AV, Artamasov SV, Frolenkov GI, Tavartki-ladze GA. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with unexpectedly short latency. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997;117:174–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney CFO, Kemp DT. Distortion product oto-acoustic emissions delay measurement in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:3721–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Kemp DT. Multicomponent acoustic distor-tion product otoacoustic emissions phase in humans. I. General characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 1996a;100: 1617–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Kemp DT. Multicomponent acoustic distor-tion product otoacoustic emissions phase in humans. II. Implications for distortion product otoacoustic emis-sions generation. J Acoust Soc Am 1996b;100:1640–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jesteadt W. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:652–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton SJ, Neely ST. Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;81:1860–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu M, Papadimitriou S, Karamitsos D, Bezerianos A. Adaptive denoising and multiscale detection of the V wave in brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 1999;4:38–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinette MS, Glattke TJ. Otoacoustic emissions. New York: Thieme, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Selters WA, Brackmann DE. Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1977;103:181 —7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore SE, Nutall AL. High-synchrony cochlear com-pound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;78:1286–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A, Achor U. Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol 1975;32:761–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockard JJ, Rossiter VS. Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormali-ties. Neurol 1977;27:316–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough W. Nonpatholo-gic factors influencing brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Am J EEG Technol 1978;18:177–209
   Google Scholar
• Talmadge CL, Long GR, Tubis A, Dhar S. Experi-mental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product oto-acoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;105:275 —92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1997;106:112–22
   Google Scholar
• Uppenkamp S, Kollmeier B. Narrowband stimulation and synchronization of otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1994;78:210–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wable J, Collet L, Berger-Vachon C, Chéry-Croze S. 2fl-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission latency: Changes with frequency and level of primaries. Audiology 1997;36: 72–82
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Schloth E. Interrelations of different oto-acoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;75:1148–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar