References
- Arlinger S, Billermark E, Oberg M, Lunner T, Hellgren J. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 51–61.
- Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–86.
- Cox RM, McDaniel DM. Development of the speech intellig-ibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 347–52.
- FDA. Guidance to hearing aid manufacturers for substantiation of claims. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Washington DC, 1994.
- Gabrielsson A, Schenkman BN, Hagerman B. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgements and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 166–77.
- Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1258–68.
- Gatehouse S. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1993; 4: 296–306.
- Gatehouse S. Acclimatization effects on non-linear hearing aid processing. Ear Hear 1998a (in press).
- Gatehouse S. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: derivation and validation of a client- centred outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 1998b (in press).
- Hagerman B. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 57–63.
- ISO 8352-2. Acoustics. Audiometric test methods—Part 2: Sound field audiometry with pure tone and narrow-band test signals. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1992.
- ISO 8352-3. Acoustics. Audiometric test methods—Part 3: Speech audiometry. International Organization for Standar-dization, Geneva, 1996.
- ISO 8402. Quality—Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1986.
- Jerlvall L, Almqvist B, Ovegard A, Arlinger S. Clinical trial of in-the-ear hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1983; 12: 63–70.
- Kochkin S. Subjective measures of satisfaction and benefit: establishing norms. Semin Hear 1997; 18: 37–48.
- Larsby B, Arlinger S. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers. Audiology 1994; 33: 165–76.
- Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algo-rithms—user preference and performance. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 373–87.
- Nilsson P. Vesterager V, Sibelle P, Sieck L, Christensen B. A double-blind cross-over study of a non-linear hearing aid. Audiology 1997; 36: 325–38.
- NSH. Nordic minimum requirements for clinical test of hearing aids. Nordic Cooperation on Disability, Stockholm, 1998.
- Parving A, Sorensen MS, Carver K, Christensen B, Sibelle P, Vesterager V. Hearing instruments and health technology—an evaluation. Scand Audiol 1997; 26: 231–9.
- Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52.