References
- Baer T, Moore BCJ, Gatehouse S. Spectral contrast enhance-ment of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality and response times. J Rehab Res Devel 1993; 30: 49–72.
- Carhart R. Tests for selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 1946a; 56: 780–94.
- Carhart R. Selection of hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol 1946b; 44: 1–18.
- Cox RM, Alexander GC, Rivera IM. Accuracy of audiometric test room simulations of three real-world listening environ-ments. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 40: 764–72.
- Foster JR, Haggard MP. (FAAF) An efficient analytical test of speech perception. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 1979; IA3: 9–12.
- Foster JR, Haggard MP. Introduction to the test manual for FAAF 11. Nottingham: MRC Institute of Hearing Research, 1984.
- Gatehouse S. Hearing aid evaluation: limitations of present procedures and future requirements. J Speech Pathol Audiol 1993; (Suppl.): 50–7.
- Gatehouse S. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 30–49.
- Gatehouse S. Outcomes measures for the evaluation of adult hearing aid fittings and services. Sci Tech Rep 1997.
- Gatehouse S, Brooks D. Pre-fitting counselling in elderly first-time hearing aid users. Br J Audiol 1998 (submitted).
- Gatehouse S. Acclimatization effects on non-linear hearing aid processing. Ear Hear 1998a (submitted).
- Gatehouse S. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile--a client centred instrument for the assessment hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 1998b (in press).
- Gatehouse S, ed. Proceedings of the 1st Eriksholm Consensus Conference on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996 (Suppl.).
- Green R. The uses and misuses of speech audiometry in rehabilitation. In: Martin M, ed. Speech audiometry, 2nd ed. London: Whurr, 1996; 150–75.
- Hygge S, Rönnberg J, Larsby B, Arlinger S. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow con-versation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 208–15.
- Larsby B, Arlinger S. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers. Audiology 1994; 33: 165–76.
- Lipsey MW. 'Design Sensitivity'—Statistical power for experimental research. London: Sage, 1990.
- Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 12–25.
- Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algo-rithms—user preference and performance. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 373–87.
- Moore BCJ, Johnson JS, Clark TM, Pluvinage V. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 349–70.
- Thornton A, Raffin M. Speech discrimination scores modelled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 507–18.