Noise analysis of real-life listening situations for maximal speech audibility in hearing aid fitting

References

• ANSI-S3.5 American national standard methods for the calculation of the articulation index. New York: Amer-ican National Standards Institute, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI-S3.5 American national standard methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. New York: American National Standards Institute, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI-53.79 American national standard methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index (Draft Version 3.1). New York: American National Standards Institute, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Braida LD, Durlach NI, Lippman RP, Hicks BL, Rabino-witz WM, Reed CM Hearing aids — a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression and frequency lowering (Monograph no 19). Rockville, MD: American Speech and Hearing Association, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D. Theoretical approaches for hearing aid selection. In: Studebaker GA, Bess FH, editors. The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report. Upper Darby, PN19082: Mono-graphs in Contemporary Audiology, 1982;175–79.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D. Hearing Aid Selection for the 1990s: where to? J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7 (6):377–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986;7: 257–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103 (2):1128–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dugal RL, Braida LD, Durlach NI. Implications of previous research for the selection of frequency-gain character-istics. In: Studebaker GA, Hochberg I, editors. Acous-tical factors affecting hearing aid performance. Balti-more: University Park Press, 1980;379–403.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104 (1):432–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtgast T, Steeneken HJM. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77(3):1069–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser G. Selecting amplification for different listening conditions. PhD thesis. Copenhagen: Technical Univer- sity of Denmark, Department of Acoustic Technology, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk FK. Use of paired comparisons in hearing aid fittings. In: Valente M, editor. Strategies for selecting and verifying hearing aid fittings. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1994;108–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lasdon LS, Warren AD, Gain A, Ratner M. Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming. ACM Trans Math Software 1978;4:34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson L. Predicting the speech recognition perfor-mance of elderly individuals with sensorineural hearing impairment. Scand Audiol 1996;25:215–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson L. Speech intelligibility index transfer func-tions and speech spectra for two Swedish speech recognition tests. Scand Audiol 1996;25:59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic CV. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;75 (4):1253–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic CV, Studebaker GA, Sherbecoe RL. An articula-tion index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired indivi-duals. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;80:50–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rankovic CM. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. PhD thesis. Minneapolis, MN 55455: University of Minnesota, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Rankovic CM, Freyman RL, Zurek PM. Potential benefits of adaptive frequency-gain characteristics for speech reception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91: 354–62.
   Google Scholar
• Steeneken HiM, Houtgast T. A physical method of measuring speech-transmission quality. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;67:318–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker GA. Fifty years of hearing aid research: an evaluation of progress. Ear Hear 1980;1:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin H Practical hearing aid selection and fitting. Baltimore, MD: Department of Veteran Affairs, Rehabi-litation Research and Development Service, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Valente M, editor. Strategies for selecting and verifying hearing aid fittings. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren RA, Festen JM, Plomp R. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:211–21.
   Google Scholar