References
- AVENELL, A. et al. (2001) Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73(3), pp. 505–509.
- BARTLEBY [available at: http://www.bartleby.com/, accessed 16 June 2003].
- BERECZIU, D. et al. (2000) A Hungarian example for handsearching specialized national health care journals of small countries for controlled trials. Is it worth the trouble?, Health Libraries Review, 17(3), pp. 144–147.
- BEST EVIDENCE MEDICAL EDUCATION COLLABORATION [available at: http:// www.bemecollaboration.org, accessed 4 April 2003].
- BRETTLE, A. et al. (1998) Searching for information on outcomes: do you need to be comprehensive?, Quality in Health Care, 7(3), pp. 163–167.
- EYSENBACH, G. et al. (2001) Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews, Medical Informatics, 26(3), pp. 203–218.
- GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL [available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/ med_ed/, accessed 4 April 2003].
- HAIG, D.A.J. (2001) Evidence retrieval in medical education: obstruc-tions and opportunities, paper presented at Association of Medical Education in Europe, Berlin, Germany.
- HAIG, D.A.J. & Coup, H.A. (2001) Evidence retrieval in medical education: obstructions and opportunities, paper presented at Association of Medical Education in Europe, Berlin, Germany. HARDEN, V., HARDEN, R.M., HAIG, A., McMANus, N.K. & I.HIFY, P.M. (2002) The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Review Project (Dundee, Scotland, NHS Education for Scotland).
- HELMER, D. (2002) Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Information Resources, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
- HELMER, D. (1999) How do various fugitive literature searching methods impact the comprehensiveness of literature uncovered for systematic review?, paper presented at 4th International Conference on Grey Literature, Washington, USA, 4–5 October.
- HOPEWELL, S. et al. (2000) A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials, Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), pp. 1625–1634.
- McAuLEY, L. et al. (2000) Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?, Lancet, 356(9237), pp. 1228–1231.
- MiNozzi, S. et al. (2000), Searching for rehabilitation articles on Medline and EMBASE: an example with cross-over design, Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 81(June), pp. 720–722.
- MIT USENET QUOTES [available at: http://www.mit.edu/afs/sipb/user/ marthag/text/h, accessed 16 June 2003].
- NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE [available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ MeSH/Mbrowser.html, accessed 4 April 2003].
- OVID TECHNOLOGIES [available at: http://gateway.ovid.com, accessed 26 November 2002].
- PANDOLFINI, C. et al. (2002) Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation, British Medical Journal, 324(3773), pp. 582–583.
- QUOTE WORLD [availabe at: http://www.quoteword.org/, accessed 16 June 2003].
- THE QUOTATIONS PAGE [available at http://www.quotationspage.com/, accessed 16 June 2003].
- WEBLUST QUOTE WORLD [available at: http://www.weblust.com/, accessed 16 June 2003].
- WILSON, P. (2002) How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet, British Medical Journal, 324(3773), pp. 598–602.