A Computerized Adaptive Knowledge Test as an assessment tool in general practice: a pilot study

References

• ANGOFF, W.F. (1971) Scales, Norms and Equivalent Scores in Educational Measurement, 2nd edn. (Washington, American Council on Education). ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION (1984) User's Manual for the MicroCAT Testing System (St Paul, MN, Author).
   Google Scholar
• ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION (1998) Fast Test Pro v1.4 (St Paul, MN, Assessment Systems Corporation [2233 University Ave., Suite 200, St Paul, MN 55114 USN).
   Google Scholar
• BERGSTROM, B.A. & LUNZ, M.E. (1999) CAT for Certification and Licensure, in: F. Drasgow & J.B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds) Innovations in Computerized Assessment, pp. 67–91 (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
   Google Scholar
• CASE, S.M. & SWANSON, D.B. (1993) Extended-matching items: a practical alternative to free-response questions, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 5(2), pp. 107–115.
   Google Scholar
• DEGRYSE, J. & RoEx, A. (2003) Parameter drift in a knowledge test with two different formats, paper submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• ELsTEIN, A., SHULMAN, L.S. & SPRAFKA, S.A. (2002) Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• GREEN, B.F., BOCK, R.D., HUMPHREYS, L.G., LINN, R.L. & NUNGESYt,R.J. (1984) Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, pp. 347–360.
   Google Scholar
• KINGSBURY, G.G. & ZARA, A.R. (1989) Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests, Applied Measurement in Education, 2(4), pp. 359–375.
   Google Scholar
• KREITER, C.D., FERGUSON, K. & GRUPPEN, L.D. (1999) Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment, Academic Medicine, 74(10), pp. 1125–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LORD, F.M. & Novicx, M.R. (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley).
   Google Scholar
• LORD, F.M. (1977) Practical applications of item characteristic curve theory, Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, pp. 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• LORD, F.M. (1980) Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
   Google Scholar
• LuEan-, R.M., DE CHAMPLAIN, A. & N UNGESYt, R.J. (1998) Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, pp. 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• LUNZ, M.E. & BERGSTROM, B.A. (1994) An empirical study of computer adaptive test administration formats, Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(3), pp. 251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LUNZ, M.E., BERGSTROM, B.A. & WRIGHT, B.D. (1992) The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency in computer adaptive tests, Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), pp. 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• MISLEVY, R.J. & Bocx, R.D. (1984) BILOG I: Maximum Likelihood Item Analysis and Test Scoring: Logistic Model (Mooresville, International Educational Services).
   Google Scholar
• NEWBLE, D.J. & JAEHER, K. (1983) The effect of assessment and examinations on the learning of medical students, Medical Education, 17, pp. 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• NEWBLE, D.J. & EN-twin-LE, N. (1986) Learning Styles and approaches: implications for medical education, Medical Education, 20(3), pp. 162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL (1997) Bilog v3.11 (Mooresville, Scientific Software International).
   Google Scholar
• STAHL, J.A. & LUNZ, M.E. (1993) Assessing the extent of overlap of items among computerized adaptive tests, paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• VALE, C.D. & GIAT I UCA, K.A. (1985) ASCAL: A Microcomputer Program for Estimating Logistic Item Parameters (St Paul, MN, Assessment Systems Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• VAN DER LINDEN, W.J. & GLASS, C.A.W. (2000) Computerized Adaptive Testing. Them), and Practice (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
   Google Scholar
• VAN DER WEL: TEN, C.P.M. (1996) The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications, Advances in Health Sciences Education, pp. 41–67.
   Google Scholar
• VAN LEEUWEN, Y.D. (1995) The Dutch Knowledge Test for General Practice: issues of validity, European Journal of General Practice, 1 pp. 113–117.
   Google Scholar
• VAN LEEUWEN, Y.D., DUSMAN, H., MOL, S.S., POLLEMANS, M.G., DROP, M.J., GROL, R.P. & VAN DER VLEUTEN, C.P. (1996) Factors influencing the growth in knowledge of trainees in general practice, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1, pp. 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• WALSER, H. & KIELY, G.L. (1987) Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets, journal of Educational Measurement, 24, pp. 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAINER, H. (1993) Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(1), pp. 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• WEISS, D.J. (1983) New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Test Them and Computerized Adaptive Testing (New York, Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• WRIGHT, B.D. & STONE, M.H. (1979) Best Test Design (Chicago, MESA Press).
   Google Scholar