References
- BASTABLE, R., BATEMAN, H., HIBBLE, A. & WELLS, C. (2005) Developing an educational curriculum in primary care with practitioner and manager involvement: The governance shackle, Medical Teacher, 27, pp 128–130.
- BENTLEY, C. & ENDERBY, P. (2005) Academic medicine: Who is it for?: Applications to local research ethics committees are down by around 40% 'Letter', BM7, 330, 361.
- BRINDLE, D. (2005) Opinion, The Guardian, Society Guardian 5, 5th January.
- COREC (2005) www.corec.org.uklapplicantslindex.htm
- GLASZ10U, P. & CHALMERS, I. (2004) Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?, BMI, 328, pp. 121–122.
- DoH (2004) NHS Research Ethics Application Form Version 3.0, January.
- JAMRODK, K. (2004) Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost?, BM7, 329, pp. 286–287.
- SADTD, R. (1992) Audit and Research, BM7, 305, pp. 905-906. SOTERIOU, T. (2004) Commentary: view from the research and development office, BM7, 329, pp. 281–282.
- UBHT (2000) How to tell the difference between audit and research University of Birmingham Hospital Trust.
- WALD, D.S. (2004) Bureaucracy of ethics application, BM7, 329, pp. 282–284.
- WARD, J.T., COUSENS, S.N., SMITH-BATHGATE, B., LEITCH, M., EvERING-rox, D., WILL, R.G. & SAunt, P.G. (2004) Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population, BM7, 329, pp. 277–279.