AMEE Education Guide no. 29: Evaluating educational programmes

References

• Alkin MC. Evaluation theory development. Evaluation Comment. 1969; 2: 2–7
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association. standards. Educational Researcher. 1992; 21: 23–26
   Google Scholar
• American Evaluation Association. Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, WR Shadish, DL Newman, MA Scheirer, C Wye, 1995; 34: 19–26, Guiding principles for evaluators
   Google Scholar
• Amie M. The Australasian Evaluation Society. Evaluation. 1995; 1: 124–125
   Google Scholar
• Atkin MC, Ellett FS. Evaluation models: Development. International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985
   Google Scholar
• Bloom BS. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, London 1956
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Evaluation Society. Standards for program evaluation in Canada: a discussion paper. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 1992; 7: 157–170
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky E, Shadish WR. Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Coles CR, Grant JG. Curriculum evaluation in medical and health-care education. ASME Medical Education Research Booklet 1. Medical Education. 1985; 19: 405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins English Dictionary. Collins English Dictionary, 3rd ed. Harper Collins, Glasgow 1994
   Google Scholar
• Cook TD. The potential and limitations of secondary evaluations. MW Apple, MJ Subkoviak, M Kamrass, 1974, Educational Evaluation: Analysis and
   Google Scholar
• Cook TD. Postpositivist critical multiplism. Social Science and Social Policy, RL Shotland, MM Mark. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record. 1963; 64: 672–683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. In praise of uncertainty. Standards for evaluation practice, PH Rossi. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1982a; 49–58
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1982b
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Ambron SR, Dornbusch SM, Hess RD, Hornik RC, Phillips DC, Walker DF, Weiner SS. Towards Reform of Program Evaluation. Jossey Bass, San Francisco 1980
   Google Scholar
• Eisner EW. Occasional Papers of the Stanford Evaluation Consortium. The Perceptive Eye: Toward the Reformation of Educational Evaluation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 1975
   Google Scholar
• Eisner EW. Taking a second look: Educational connoisseurship revisited. Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century, MW McLaughlin, DC Philips. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1991, Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Association for the Study of Education, Part 2
   Google Scholar
• Elliot J, Adelman C. Reflecting where the action is. Education for Teaching. 1973; 92: 8–20
   Google Scholar
• Glymour C, Scheines R. Causal modelling with the TETRAD program. Synthese. 1986; 68: 37–63
   Google Scholar
• Gronlund NE. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1981
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Hammond RL. Evaluation at the local level. Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice, BR Worthen, JR Sanders. Wordsworth, Belmont, CA 1973; 157–169
   Google Scholar
• Hawkridge D. Persuading the dons?. British Journal of Educational Technology. 1979; 10: 164–174
   Google Scholar
• Hennigan KM, Flay BR, Cook TD. ‘Give me the facts’: some suggestions for using social science knowledge in national policy making. Advances in Applied Social Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1980
   Google Scholar
• Holt M. Evaluating the Evaluators. Hodder & Stoughton, Sevenoaks 1981
   Google Scholar
• Honea GE. Ethics and public sector evaluators: nine case studies, unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia, Department of Educational Studies. 1992
   Google Scholar
• House ER. Justice in evaluation. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, GV Glass. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1976; 1
   Google Scholar
• House ER. Assumptions underlying evaluation models. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, GF Madaus, M Scriven, DL Stufflebeam. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston 1983
   Google Scholar
• House ER. Principled evaluation: A critique of the AEA Guiding Principles. Guiding Principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, WR Shadish, DL Newman, MA Scheirer, C Wye. Josey Bass, San-Francisco 1995; 66: 27–34
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee On Standards For Educational Evaluation. The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Kelly AV. The Curriculum: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. Paul Chapman Publishing, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Kourilsky M. An adversary model for educational evaluation. Evaluation Comment. 1973; 4: 3–6
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Rosenberg M. The Language of Social Research. Free Press, Glencoe, IL 1955
   Google Scholar
• Levine M, Brown E, Fitzgerald C, Goplerud E, Gordon ME, Jayne-Lararus C, Rosenberg N, Slater J. Adapting the jury trial for program evaluation: a report of an experience. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1978; 1: 177–186
   Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. Harper & Brothers, New York 1948
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Love AJ. Should evaluators be certified?. The Preparation of Professional Evaluators: Issues, Perspectives, and Programs, JW Altschuld, M Engle. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1994; 29–40, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62
   Google Scholar
• Madaus GF, Scriven MS, Stufflebeam DL. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Klewer-Nijhoff, Boston 1983
   Google Scholar
• Mehrens WA. Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 4th edn. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Metfessel NS, Michael WB. A paradigm involving multiple criterion measures for the evaluation of the effectiveness of school programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1967; 27: 931–943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrisett I, Stevens WW. Steps in Curriculum Analysis Outline. University of Colorado, Social Science Education Consortium, Boulder 1967
   Google Scholar
• Muraskin L. Understanding Evaluation: The Way to Better Prevention Programs. Westat Inc., Rockville, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Newble D, Cannon R. A Handbook for Medical Teachers, 3rd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1994
   Google Scholar
• Owens TR. Educational evaluation by adversary proceeding. School Evaluation: The Politics and Process, ER House. McCutchan, Berkeley, CA 1973
   Google Scholar
• Parlett M, Hamilton D. Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programs. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, GV Glass. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1976; 1
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Utilization-focused Evaluation, 2nd edn. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Popham WJ. Educational Evaluation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Provus MM. Evaluation of ongoing programs in the public school system. Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice, BR Worthen, JR Sanders. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 1973
   Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 3rd edn. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, RW Tyler, RM Gagne, M Scriven. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Evaluation 1, Rand McNally, Chicago 1967; 39–83
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Comment. 1972; 3: 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. Goal-free evaluation. School Evaluation: The Politics and Process, ER House. McCutchin, Berkley, CA 1974; 319–328
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. The Logic of Evaluation. Edgepress, Inverness, CA 1980
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. The evaluation taboo. Philosophy of Evaluation, ER House. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1983; 75–82
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. Evaluation ideologies. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, RF Connor, DG Altman, C Jackson. CA, Sage, Beverly Hills 1984; 9
   Google Scholar
• Scriven M. Key evaluation checklist. Evaluation Thesaurus, 4th edn, M Scriven. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Sechrest L, West SG, Phillips M, Redner R, Yeaton W. Some neglected problems in evaluation research. Evaluation Studies Review Annual. 1979; 4: 15–35
   Google Scholar
• Shadish WR. Critical multiplism: a research strategy and its attendant tactics. Program Evaluation: A Pluralistic Enterprise, L Sechrest. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1993; 13–57, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 60
   Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD, Leviton LC. Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Tyler RW. Appraising and Recording Student Progress. Harper & Row, New York 1942
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record. 1967; 68: 523–539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake RE. Program Evaluation, particularly Responsive Evaluation. Western Michigan University Evaluation Centre, Kalamazoo 1975, Occasional paper No. 5
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE. Evaluating Educational Programmes: the Need and the Response. CERI/OECD, Menlo Park, CA 1976
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam DL. Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. F.E. Peacock, Itasca, IL 1971
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam DL. Professional standards and ethics for evaluators. Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century, MW McLaughlin, DC Philips. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1991, Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Association for the Study of Education, Part 2
   Google Scholar
• Taba H. Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York 1962
   Google Scholar
• Trend MG. On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: a case study. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research, TD Cook, CS Reichardt. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA 1979; 68–86
   Google Scholar
• Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1977
   Google Scholar
• Tyler RW. Evaluation: A challenge to progressive education. Education Research Bulletin. 1935; 14: 9–16
   Google Scholar
• Tyler RW. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1949
   Google Scholar
• Weiss CH. The stakeholder approach to evaluation: origins and promise. Stakeholder-based Evaluation, AS Bryk. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1983a; 3–14
   Google Scholar
• Weiss CH. Towards the future of stakeholder approaches in evaluation. Stakeholder-based Evaluation, AS Bryk. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1983b; 83–96
   Google Scholar
• Wholley JS. Evaluation and Effective Public Management. Little, Brown, Boston 1983
   Google Scholar
• Wholley JS. Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, JS Wholley, HP Hatry, KE Newcomer. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Wolf RL. Trial by jury: a new evaluation method. Phi Delta Kappan. 1975; 57: 185–187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf RL. The use of judicial evaluation methods in the formulation of educational policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1979; 1: 19–28
   Google Scholar
• Worthen BL, Sanders JR, Fitzpatrick JL. Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 2nd edn. Longman, New York 1997
   Google Scholar