References
- Bennett KJ, Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Neufeld VR, Tugwell P, Roberts R. A controlled trial of teaching critical appraisal of the clinical literature to medical students. Journal of the American Medical Association 1987; 257: 2451–2454
- Carney PA, Nierenberg DW, Pipas CF, Brooks WB, Stukel TA, Keller AM. Educational epidemiology: applying population-based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004; 292: 1044–1050
- Case SM. Extended-matching items: a practical alternative to free–response questions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1993; 5: 107–115
- GMC. Tomorrow's Doctors. General Medical Council, London 2003, Available online at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/med_ed/tomdoc.htm (accessed April 2005).
- Haddad DF, Green SA, Olver RE. Core Paediatrics and Child Health. Churchill Livingstone, London 2000
- Harden RM, Lever R, Dunn WR, Lindsay A, Holroyd C, Wilson GM. An experiment involving substitution of tape-slide programmes for lectures. Lancet 1969; 1: 933–935
- Nash JR. Pathology in the new medical curriculum: what has replaced the subject courses?. Pathology Oncology Research 2000; 6: 149–154
- Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Medical Education 2003; 37: 582–584
- Oakley A. Experimentation and social interventions: a forgotten but important history. British Medical Journal 1998; 317: 1239–1242
- Torgerson CJ. Educational research and randomised trials. Medical Education 2002; 36: 1002–1003
- Trzebiatowski GL, Williams JH, Sachs LA, Altman M, Bellchambers M. Independent study: 10-year programme review. Medical Education 1987; 21: 458–463
- Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D. A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of teaching provided by a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture. Medical Education 2001; 35: 847–854