References
- Alves de Lima A, Henquin R, Thierer J, Paulin J, Lamari S, Belcastro F, van der Vleuten CP. A qualitative study of impact on learning of the mini clinical evaluation exercise in postgraduate training. Med Teach 2005; 27: 46–52
- http://www.abim.org/, /minicex/default.htm (24 Oct 2005), American Board of Internal Medicine. The Mini-CEX: A quality tool in evaluation
- Brennan RL. Generalizability Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York 2001
- Carline JD, Paauw DS, Thiede KW, Ramsey PG. Factors affecting the reliability of ratings of students’ clinical skills in a medicine clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 1992; 7: 506–510
- Crossley J, Davies H, Humphris G, Jolly B. Generalisability: a key to unlock professional assessment. Med Educ 2002; 36: 972–978
- Durning SJ, Cation LJ, Markert RJ, Pangaro LN. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training. Acad Med 2002; 77: 900–904
- Epstein R. Asessment in medical education. N Eng J Med 2007; 356: 387–396
- Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE. Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 42–48
- Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE, Huot SJ. Effects of training in direct observation of medical residents’ clinical competence: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 874–881
- Holmboe ES. Faculty and the observation of trainees' clinical skills: problems and opportunities. Acad Med 2004; 79: 16–22
- Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot SJ. Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 558–561
- Kreiter CD, Ferguson K, Lee WC, Brennan RL, Densen P. A generalizability study of a new standardized rating form used to evaluate students' clinical clerkship performances. Acad Med 1998; 73: 1294–1298
- Kroboth FJ, Hanusa BH, Parker S, Coulehan JL, Kapoor WN, Brown FH, Karpf M, Levey GS. The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of a clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 1992; 7: 174–179
- Kwolek CJ, Donnelly MB, Sloan DA, Birrell SN, Strodel WE, Schwartz RW. Ward evaluations: should they be abandoned?. J Surg Res 1997; 69: 1–6
- Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65: S63–67
- Newble DI, Jaeger K. The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ 1983; 17: 165–171
- Newble DI, Hejka EJ, Whelan G. The approaches to learning of specialist physicians. Med Educ 1990; 24: 101–119
- Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 795–799
- Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. Examiner differences in the mini-CEX. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1997; 2: 27–33
- Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 476–481
- Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993; 269: 1655–1660
- Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment. Med Educ 2006; 40: 296–300
- Van der Vleuten C. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1996; 1: 41–67
- Van der Vleuten C. Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training. BMJ 2000; 321: 1217–1219
- Van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. Assessment of professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39: 309–317
- Violato C, Marini A, Toews J, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians. Acad Med 1997; 72: S82–84
- Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med 2003; 15: 270–292