Using medical knowledge sources on handheld computers – A qualitative study among junior doctors

References

• Barbour RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 2005; 39: 742–750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett JR, Strayer SM, Schubart JR. Assessing medical residents' usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73: 25–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe GW, Fore Arcand LG, Lin T, Johnson J, Rai A, Kollins K. Students' and residents' perceptions regarding technology in medical training. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30: 470–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 1995; 311: 251–473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Raynor ME. The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press, BostonMass 2003
   Google Scholar
• Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. Int J Med Inform 2003; 71: 9–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endacott R. Clinical research 4: qualitative data collection and analysis. Inten Criti Care Nurs 2005; 21: 123–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorman PN. Information Needs of Physicians. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1995; 46: 729–736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso MA, Yen MJ, Mintz ML. Survey of handheld computing among medical students. Comp Methods Pro Biomedi 2006; 82: 196–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkke V. Knowledge Freedom for Medical Professionals – An Evaluation Study of a Mobile Information System for Physicians in Finland. Turku Centre for Computer Science. Åbo, Åbo Akademi University. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevern J, Webb C. Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 2001; 21: 323–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kho A, Henderson LE, Dressler DD, Kripalani S. Use of handheld computers in medical education. A systematic review. J Gen Int em Med 2006; 21: 531–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995; 311: 299–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler P, Keller K. Marketing Management. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2006
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage, Beverly HillsCalifornia 1980
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage, Thousand OaksCalifornia 1996
   Google Scholar
• Leung GM, Johnston JM, Tin KY, Wong IO, Ho LM, Lam WW, Lam TH. Randomised controlled trial of clinical decision support tools to improve learning of evidence based medicine in medical students. BMJ 2003; 327(7423): 1090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning. Studentlitteratur, LundSweden 1998, [In Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ 2004; 328: 1162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod TG, Ebbert JO, Lymp JF. Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 605–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca EA, Chen ES, Stetson PD, Mcknight LK, Lei J, Cimino JJ. Approach to mobile information and communication for health care. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73: 631–638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca EA, Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, Seol YH. Accessing heterogeneous sources of evidence to answer clinical questions. J Biomed Inform 2001; 34: 85–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Determining sample size. Qual Health Res 2000; 10: 3–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osheroff JA, Bankowitz RA. Physicians' use of computer software in answering clinical questions. Bull Med Lib Assoc 1993; 81: 11–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.: London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Prohospital. Proffice. vers. 1.0 ed. Stockholm, Ed. O. Landgren. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006; 81: 207–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell CK, Gregory DM. Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evid-Based Nurs 2003 2003; 6: 36–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safemed. Pharmtech. 1.2 ed. Stockholm. 2003
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Focus on qualitative methods: sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 1995; 18: 179–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MD. Disruptive innovation: Can health care learn from other industries? A conversation with Clayton M. Christensen. Health Aff 2007; 26(3)288–295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Ng JH. Googling for a diagnosis—use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study. BMJ 2006; 333: 1143–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoCalif 2005
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Coiera E. Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? A study of 55,000 clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 113–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar