References
- Aaron S. The state of play in 1999: A new curriculum for the MD degree at the University of Alberta. Clin Inves Med 2000; 23: 2–26
- Anderson J. The continuum of medical education: The role of basic medical sciences. J Roy Coll of Phys Lond 1993; 27: 405–407
- Barrows HS. Problem-based, self-directed learning. JAMA 1983; 250: 3077–3080
- Bligh J. Learning about science is still important. Med Educ 2003; 37: 944–945
- Boshuizen HPA. The shock of practice: effects on clinical reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York 1996, 1996
- Custers EJFM, Ten Cate ThJ. Medical students’ attitudes towards and perception of the basic sciences: A comparison between students in the old and the new curriculum at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Med Educ 2002; 36: 1142–1150
- Dahle LO, Brynhildsen J, Behrbohm Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem–based undergraduate medical curriculum: Examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Med Teach 2002; 24(8): 280–285
- General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. GMC Publications, UK 2003
- Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Basic sciences in problem–based learning and conventional curricula: students’ attitudes. Med Educ 1997; 31: 177–180
- Keijsers CJPW, Custers EJFM. Ten Cate ThJ. submitted. Differences in basic science knowledge between students in a traditional, discipline based and an innovative, integrated curriculum
- Lowry S. Medical Education. BMJ Publishing Group, London, UK 1993
- Prince KJAH, Boshuizen HPA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. Students’ opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Med Educ 2005; 39: 704–712
- West M, Mennin SP, Kaufman A, Galey W. Medical students’ attitudes toward basic sciences: Influence of a primary care curriculum. Med Educ 1982; 16: 188–191