Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education

References

• Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 1999; 19(3)745–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programmes and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 1999; 12(1)55–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dev P, Montgomery K, Senger S, Leroy Heinrichs W, Srivastava S, Waldron K. Simulated medical learning environments on the Internet. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2002; 9(5)437–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drebin RA, Carpenter L. Volume rendering. Comput Graph 1988; 22(4)65–74
   Google Scholar
• Friedl R, Preisack MB, Klas W, Rose T, Stracke S, Quast KJ. Virtual reality and 3D visualizations in heart surgery education. Heart Surg Forum 2002; 5(3)17–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyrenius A, Bergdahl B, Silén C. Lectures in problem-based learning-why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Med Teach 2005; 27: 61–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyrenius A, Wirell S, Silén C. Student approaches to achieving understanding Approaches to learning revisited. Stud Higher Educ 2007; 32(2)149–165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyrenius A, Wigström L, Ebbers T, Karlsson M, Engvall J, Bolger AF. Three-dimensional flow in the human left atrium. Heart 2001; 86(4)448–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 2001; 3; 357(9253)363–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar M, Bergdahl B, Öhman L, (Eds). Celebrating the Past by Expanding the Future, The Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköpings Universitet 1986–2006. Medical Faculty Report 3. Linköping University Electronic press, LinköpingSweden 2006
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer L, Patterson J, Harper B. ICT in higher education: evaluating outcomes for health education. J Comp Ass Learning 2001; 17(3)275–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F, Booth S. Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ 1997
   Google Scholar
• Maudsley G. Do we all mean the same thing by “problem-based learning”? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Acad Med 1999; 74(2)178–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 2004; 38: 418–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael J. Students’ misconceptions about perceived physiological responses. Advan Physiol Educ 1998; 19(1)90–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael J. Undergraduates’ understanding of cardiovascular phenomena. Advan Physiol Educ 2002; 26(2)72–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller R. Approaches to learning spatial relationships in gross anatomy: perspective from wider principles of learning. Clin Anat 2000; 13: 439–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell HI, Michael JA, Adamson T, Goldberg J, Horwitz BA, Bruce DS, Hudson ML, Whitescarver SA, Williams S. Helping undergraduates repair faulty mental models in the student laboratory. Advan Physiol Educ 2000; 23: 82–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell HI, Michael JA, Adamson T, Horwitz BA. Enhancing active learning in the student laboratory. Advan Physiol Educ 2004; 28: 107–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder GL, Scott JN, Anderson MD. Using QuickTime virtual reality objects in computer-assisted instruction of gross anatomy: Yorick–the VR Skull. Clin Anat 2000; 13(4)287–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak JD. The promise of new ideas and new technology for improving teaching and learning. Cell Biol Educ 2003; 2: 122–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson D, Speck D. Addressing students’ misconceptions of renal clearance. Advan Physiol Educ 2004; 28(4)210–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosse C. The potential of computerized representations of anatomy in the training of health care providers. Acad Med 1995; 70: 499–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin–Baden M. Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham 2000
   Google Scholar
• Silén C. Responsibility and independence in learning – what is the role of the educators and the framework of the educational programme?. Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning – Theory, Research and Practice, C Rust. The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford 2003
   Google Scholar
• Silén C. Does Problem-based Learning make students go meta?. Challenging research in Problem-based Learning, M Savin-Baden, K Wilkie. SRHE & Open University Press, Maidenhead 2004
   Google Scholar
• Spiro RJ, Feltovich PJ, Coulson RL, Anderson DK. Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, S Vosniadou, A Ortony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989; 498–531
   Google Scholar
• Trelease RB, Nieder GL, Dorup J, Hansen MS. Going virtual with Quicktime VR: new methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures. Anat Rec 2000; 261(2)64–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wigström L, Ebbers T, Fyrenius A, Karlsson M, Engvall J, Wranne B, Bolger AF. Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI. Mag Res Med 1999; 41: 793–799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirkel JB, Zirkel PA. Technological alternatives to actual dissection in anatomy instruction: a review of the research. Educ Technol 1997; 37(6)52–56
   Google Scholar