e-Learning in medical education Guide 32 Part 2: Technology, management and design

References

• Adams D. The Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. Pocket Books. Pan McMillan, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Andrews R, Haythornthwaite C. The SAGE Handbook of r-Learning research. Sage, LondonUK 2007
   Google Scholar
• Barrett E, Lally V. Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. J Comput Assist Learn 1999; 15(1)48–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning. Milton Keynes. OU Press, UK 1999
   Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P. The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, USA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Carroll JM. Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 1991
   Google Scholar
• Castells M. The rise of the network society. Blackwell, UK 2000
   Google Scholar
• Clark D. Blended learning. EPIC Group PLC, Brighton 2003
   Google Scholar
• Clark R. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev Educ Res 1983; 53: 4445–4460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark R, Mayer R. e-Learning and the science of instruction. Pfeiffer, San Francisco 2003
   Google Scholar
• Clark R, Nguyen F, Sweller J. Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Pfeiffer, San Francisco 2006
   Google Scholar
• Conole G, Oliver M. Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research. Routledge, AbingdonUK 2007
   Google Scholar
• Collis B, Moonen J. Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and Expectations. Kogan Page, LondonUK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Cook J. Virtual learning environments in UK medical education: LTSN-01 Mini-project report, LTSN-01 2005
   Google Scholar
• Crook C. Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. Routledge, UK 1994
   Google Scholar
• Davies W. Digital exuberance. Prospect 2006; 119: 30–33
   Google Scholar
• de la Varre C, Ellaway R, Dewhurst D. Analysis of the large-scale use of online discussion boards in a blended learning environment. Exploring the Frontiers of E-learning: Borders, Outposts and Migration (Research Proceedings ALT-C 2005), J Cook, DP Whitelock. ALT, ManchesterUK 2005; 86–97
   Google Scholar
• Ellaway R. Weaving the ‘e's Together. med teach 2006a; 28(7)587–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellaway R. Evaluating a virtual learning environment in medical education. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 2006b, PhD thesis
   Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Cameron H, Ross M, Laurie G, Maxwell M, Pratt R. 2006, Clinical recordings for academic non-clinical settings: CHERRI project report (Edinburgh, JISC/University of Edinburgh), Available online at http://www.cherri.mvm.ed.ac.uk/cherri.pdf (accessed 29 April 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Dewhurst D, Cumming A. Managing and supporting medical education with a virtual learning environment - the Edinburgh Electronic Medical Curriculum. Med Teach 2003; 25(4)372–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman B. Human values and the design of computer technology USA. CSLI Publications. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Garg AX, Norman GR, Spero L. Is there any real virtue of virtual reality? The minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Acad Med 2002; 77: S97–S99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham G. The Internet://A Philosophical Enquiry. Routledge. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Herring S. Gender differences in CMC: findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Newsletter 2000; 18(1), Available online at http://www.cpsr.org/prevsite/publications/newsletters/issues/2000/Winter2000/herring.html (accessed 29 April 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Horton W. e-learning by design. Pfeiffer, San Francisco 2006
   Google Scholar
• Jochems W, Van Merriënboer J, Koper R. Integrated e-learning: implications for pedagogy, technology and organization. RoutledgeFalmer, LondonUK 2004
   Google Scholar
• Joint Information Systems Committee. Student expectations study: key findings from online research and discussion evenings held in June 2007 for the Joint Information Systems Committee. JISC, London 2007
   Google Scholar
• Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Circle.com Library, USA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Land R, Bayne S. Screen or monitor?. Surveillance and disciplinary power in online environments. Education in cyberspace, R Land, S Bayne. Routledge, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard D. Rethinking university teaching–A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. RoutledgeFalmer, UK 2002
   Google Scholar
• Lessig L. The future of ideas. Vintage Books, New York, NYUSA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn AH. Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning. Open & flexible learning, Kogan Page 2003
   Google Scholar
• Marinopoulos S, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson L, Ashar B, Magaziner J, Miller R, Thomas P, Prokopowicz G, Qayyum R, Bass E. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice Center, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 149. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 2007
   Google Scholar
• Masters K, Oberprieler G. Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Comput Educ 2004; 42(4)319–332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi BA, O’day VL. Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart. MIT Press, Boston 1999
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Designing web usability. New Riders, USA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Norman DA. The design of everyday things. MIT Press, USA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Norman G. Principles of e-learning: lessons from cognitive psychology. Proceedings of the slice of life conference, Salt Lake City, 2007; 56
   Google Scholar
• Oberprieler G, Masters K, Gibbs T. Information technology and information literacy for first year health sciences students in South Africa: matching early and professional needs. Med Teach 2005; 27(7)595–598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Educ Technol Soc 4:3 2000, Available online at: http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_%D 2000/intro.html (accessed 2 September 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M, Roberts G, Beetham H, Ingraham B, Dyke M, Levy P. Knowledge, society and perspectives on learning technology. Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research, G Conole, M Oliver. Routledge, AbingdonUK 2007; 21–37
   Google Scholar
• Postman N. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage, USA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Preece J, Sharp H, Benyon D, Holland S, Carey T. Human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley, UK 1994
   Google Scholar
• Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon 2001; 9(5)3–6
   Google Scholar
• Ritter FE, Nerb J, Lehtinen E, O'shea TM. In order to learn: how the sequence of topics influences learning. Oxford University Press, New York 2007
   Google Scholar
• Roberts T. 2002, Disabled students–disabled doctors–time for a change? LTSN-01, Newcastle-upon-Tyne
   Google Scholar
• Russell TL. The no significant difference phenomenon: a comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education (IDECC) 2001
   Google Scholar
• Salmon G. E-Moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. Routledge Falmer, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Salmon G. E-tivities: the key to active online learning. Routledge Falmer, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Savicki V, Lingenfelter D, Kelley M. Gender language style and group composition in internet discussion groups. J Comput Med Commun 1996, Available aonline at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol 12/issue 3/savicki.html (accessed 29 April 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Savin-baden M, Wilkie K. A practical guide to problem-based learning online. Routledge, UK 2007
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough H, Corbett JM. Technology and Organization: Power, Meaning and Design. Routledge, UK 1992
   Google Scholar
• Twigg CA. Innovations in online learning: moving beyond no significant difference (Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) 2001
   Google Scholar
• Usha kiran TS, Shylasree TS, Jayawickram NS. Computer skills among trainee doctors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 24: 81–82
   Google Scholar
• Ward JPT, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehman HPB. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet 2001; 357: 792–796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley DA. 2000, The instructional use of learning objects–Available online at: http://reusability.org/read (last accessed July 2007)
   Google Scholar