References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. 2014. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Case SM, Swanson DB. 2002. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.
- Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. 2009. Assessment in health professions education. New York and London: Routledge.
- Downing SM. 2005. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 19:133–143.
- Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. 2002. A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Appl Meas Educ. 15:309–333.
- Haladyna TM. 2004. Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Humaira K, Khalid D, Azra A, Masood A. 2013. Identification of technical item flaws leads to improvement of the quality of single best Multiple Choice Questions. Pak J Med Sci. 29:715–719.
- Jozefowicz RF, Koeppen BM, Case S, Galbraith R, Swanson D, Glew RH. 2002. The quality of in-house medical school examinations. Acad Med. 77:156–161.
- Malau-Aduli BS, Zimitat C. 2011. Peer review improves the quality of MCQ examinations. Assess Eval High Educ. 37:1–13.
- Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Park YS, Hyderi A, Bordage G, Xing K, Yudkowsky R. 2016. Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 21:761–773.
- Shakil M. 2008. Assessing student performance using test item analysis and its relevance to the state exit final exams of MAT0024 Classes: an action research project. Polygons. 2:1–35.
- Tarrant M, Ware J, Mohammed AM. 2009. An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis. BMC Med Educ. 9:40
- Tarrant M, Ware J. 2008. Assessment impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments. Med Educ. 42:198–206.
- Vanderbilt A, Feldman M, Wood IK. 2013. Medical education: a review of course exams. Med Educ Online. 1:1–5.
- Wallach PM, Crespo LM, Holtzman KZ, Galbraith RM, Swanson DB. 2006. Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 11:61–68.