The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools

References

• ACER. 2015a. UMAT2015 Information booklet. [accessed 2016 May 31]. https://umat.acer.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• ACER. 2015b. GAMSAT Australia 2015 Information booklet. [accessed 2016 May 31]. https://gamsat.acer.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Dowell J, McLachlan J, Nicholson S, Petterson F. 2012. Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students. London: General Medical Council.
   Google Scholar
• Coates H. 2008. Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test (GAMSAT). Med Educ. 42:999–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy DM, Kroopnick MH, Dowd KW, Searcy CA, Zhao X. 2013. The predictive validity of the MCAT exam in relation to academic performance through medical school: a National Cohort Study of 2001–2004 matriculants. Acad Med. 88:666–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards D, Friedman T, Pearce J. 2013. Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 13:173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott SJ, Epstein J. 2005. Selecting the future doctors: the role of graduate medical programmes. Intern Med. 35:174–177.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. 2002. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 324:952–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin BN. 2011. Predictive validity of the UMAT for medical students’ academic performance. Med J Aust. 195:102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves MA, Gordon J, Ryan G. 2007. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think? Med J Aust. 186:120–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambur S, Hunt M, Jackel B, Pywell S, McCurry D, Nixon J, Raivers A. 2008. GAMSAT construct validity review. A report prepared for the members of the GAMSAT Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Husbands A, Mathieson A, Dowell J, Cleland J, McKenzie R. 2014. Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 14:88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus IC, Dewberry C, Nicholson S, Dowell JS. 2013. The UKCAT-12 study: educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools. BMC Med. 11:244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer A, Chiavaroli N. 2006. UMAT: a validity study. A review of the underlying constructs and an analysis of the content of the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test. A report prepared for the UMAT Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer A, Puddey IB. 2011. Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: a prospective study. Med Teach. 33:997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson S. 2005. The benefits of aptitude testing for selecting medical students. BMJ. 331:559–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. 2006. Commentary: standardising the process versus improving the methods. BMJ. 332:1008–1009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. 2016. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ. 50:36–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole P, Shulruf B, Rudland J, Wilkinson T. 2012. Comparison of UMAT and admission GPA on the prediction of performance on medical school assessments: a national, cross-institution study. Med Educ. 46:163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puddey IB, Mercer A. 2013. Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT). BMC Med Educ. 13:155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puddey IB, Mercer A. 2014. Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme. BMC Med Educ. 14:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich AM, Ayers KMS, Thomson WM, Sinclair RJ, Rohan MJ, Seymour GJ. 2012. Does performance in selection processes predict performance as a dental student? Eur J Dent Educ.16:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulruf B, Poole P, Wang GY, Rudland J, Wilkinson T. 2012. How well do selection tools predict performance later in a medical programme? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 17:615–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson PL, Scicluna HA, Jones PD, Cole AMD, O’Sullivan AJ, Harris PG, McNeil HP. 2014. Predictive validity of a new integrated selection process for medical school admission. BMC Med Educ. 14:86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story M, Mercer A. 2005. Selection of medical students: an Australian perspective. Intern Med J. 35:647–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffin PA, Mwandigha LM, Paton LW, Hesselgreaves H, McLachlan JC, Finn GM, Kasim AS. 2016. Predictive validity of the UKCAT for medical school undergraduate performance: a national prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 14:140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D, Zhang J, Byrne G, Luke H, Ozolins I, Parker MH, Peterson RF. 2008. Medical school selection criteria and the prediction of academic performance. Med J Aust. 188:349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D, Zhang J, Parker M. 2011. Predictive validity of the undergraduate medicine and health sciences admission test for medical students’ academic performance. Med J Aust. 194:341–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1968. Evolution and the genetics of populations: genetics and biometric foundations. Vol. 1, Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar