339
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring the relationship between examiners’ memories for performances, domain separation and score variability

, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Baddeley A. 1992. Working memory: the interface between memory and cognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 4:281–288.
  • Baddeley A, Eysenck M, Anderson M. 2015. Memory. 2nd ed. London and New York: Taylor Francis.
  • Bäuml K. 1996. Revisiting an old issue: retroactive interference as a function of the degree of original and interpolated learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 3:380–384.
  • Brannick MT, Erol-Korkmaz HT, Prewett M. 2011. A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores. Med Educ. 45:1181–1189.
  • Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Mandrekar JN, Pankratz VS. 2010. Internal structure of mini-CEX scores for internal medicine residents: factor analysis and generalizability. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 15:633–645.
  • Cook DA, Dupras DM, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Pankratz VS. 2009. Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 24:74–79.
  • Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. 2006. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med. 355:1339–1344.
  • Dickerson BC, Eichenbaum H. 2010. The episodic memory system: neurocircuitry and disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 35:86–104.
  • Donato AA, Pangaro L, Smith C, Rencic J, Diaz Y, Mensinger J, Holmboe E. 2008. Evaluation of a novel assessment form for observing medical residents: a randomised, controlled trial. Med Educ. 42:1234–1242.
  • Gauthier G, St-Onge C, Tavares W. 2016. Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings. Med Educ. 50:511–522.
  • General Medical Council. 2017. Outcomes for Graduates [Internet]. https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/undergrad_outcomes_overarching.asp
  • Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. 2014. Seeing the “black box” differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 48:1055–1068.
  • Gingerich A, Ramlo SE, van der Vleuten CPM, Eva KW, Regehr G. 2017. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters’ divergent points of view. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 22:819–838.
  • Grömping U. 2006. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Soft. 17(1):1–27. https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v017i01
  • Harasym PH, Woloschuk W, Cunning L. 2008. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 13: 617–632.
  • Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Schuwirth L, Wass V, van der Vleuten C. 2014. Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20:229–245.
  • Herlitz A, Nilsson LG, Bäckman L. 1997. Gender differences in episodic memory. Mem Cognit. 25:801–811.
  • Junod Perron N, Louis-Simonet M, Cerutti B, Pfarrwaller E, Sommer J, Nendaz M. 2016. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors’ profile. BMC Med Educ. 16:293.
  • Lee V, Brain K, Martin J. 2017. Factors influencing mini-CEX rater judgments and their practical implications: a systematic literature review. Acad Med. 92:880–887.
  • Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. 2015. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 4:284–299.
  • McKinley DW, Boulet JR. 2005. Using factor analysis to evaluate checklist items. Acad Med. 80:S102–S105.
  • McManus IC, Thompson M, Mollon J. 2006. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency (’hawk-dove effect’) in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ. 6: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid =1569374&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  • Newble D. 2004. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. 38:199–203.
  • Norman G. 2009. Dual processing and diagnostic errors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14 Suppl 1:37–49.
  • Pell G, Homer MS, Roberts TE. 2008. Assessor training: its effects on criterion‐based assessment in a medical context. Int J Res Method Educ. 31:143–154.
  • R Development Core Team. (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  • Schacter DL, Chiao JY, Mitchell JP. 2003. The seven sins of memory implications for self. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 7:226–239.
  • Sinclair L, Kunda Z. 1999. Reactions to a black professional: motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 77:885–904.
  • Streiner D, Norman G. 2008. Health measurement scales. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tavares W, Eva KW. 2014. Impact of rating demands on rater-based assessments of clinical competence. Educ Prim Care. 25:308–318.
  • Tavares W, Ginsburg S, Eva KW. 2016. Selecting and Simplifying: rater performance and behavior when considering multiple competencies. Teach Learn Med. 28:41–51.
  • Tulving E. 2002. Episodic Memory: from mind to brain. Annu Rev Psychol. 53:1–25.
  • Volkan K, Simon SR, Baker H, Todres ID. 2004. Psychometric structure of a comprehensive objective structured clinical examination: a factor analytic approach. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 9:83–92.
  • Walter SR, Li L, Dunsmuir WTM, Westbrook JI. 2014. Managing competing demands through task-switching and multitasking: a multi-setting observational study of 200 clinicians over 1000 hours. BMJ Qual Saf. 23:231–241.
  • Wang B. 2014. Effect of time delay on recognition memory for pictures: The modulatory role of emotion. PLoS One. 9:e100238.
  • Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. 2013. Seeing the same thing differently: mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 18:325–341.
  • Yeates P, Woolf K, Benbow E, Davies B, Boohan M, Eva K. 2017. A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners’ scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams. BMC Med. 15:179.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.