1,183
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A snapshot of current Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) practice at Australian medical schools

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all

References

  • Australian Medical Council. 2012. Standards for Assessment and Accreditation of Primary Medical Programs by the Australian Medical Council 2012. Australian Medical Council Limited.
  • Boursicot KA. 2010. Structured assessments of clinical competence. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 71:342–344.
  • Carmichael A, Hourn M. 2011. Developing a framework of competencies for medical graduate outcomes. Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand Incorporated.
  • Confederation of Postgraduate Medical Councils. 2012. Australian curriculum framework for junior doctors [accessed 2017]. http://curriculum.cpmec.org.au/index.cfm.
  • Downing SM. 2003. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 37:830–837.
  • Epstein RM. 2007. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 356:387–396.
  • Hamdy H, Telmesani AW, Wardy NA, Abdel-Khalek N, Carruthers G, Hassan F, Kassab S, Abu-Hijleh M, Al-Roomi K, O’Malley K, et al. 2010. Undergraduate medical education in the Gulf Cooperation Council: a multi-countries study (Part 2). Med Teach. 32:290–295.
  • Harden R, Lilley P, Patricio M. 2016. The definitive guide to the OSCE: the Objective Structured Clinical Examination as a performance assessment. Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier.
  • Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. 1975. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1:447–451.
  • Hays R, Hourn M. 2012. Medical Graduate Competency Framework Stage 2 Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand Incorporated; Health Workforce Australia.
  • Hays R, Hourn M. 2014. Developing a National Assessment Blueprint for Clinical Competencies for the Medical Graduate. Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand Incorporated; Health Workforce Australia.
  • Hodges B, McIlroy JH. 2003. Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training. Med Educ. 37:1012–1016.
  • Humphrey-Murto S, Smee S, Touchie C, Wood TJ, Blackmore DE. 2005. A comparison of physician examiners and trained assessors in a high-stakes OSCE setting. Acad Med. 80:S59–S62.
  • Hunter DM, Jones RM, Randhawa B. 1996. The use of holistic versus analytic scoring for large-scale assessment of writing. Can J Prog Eval. 11:61–85.
  • Khan KZ, Gaunt K, Ramachandran S, Pushkar P. 2013. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: organisation and administration. Med Teach. 35:e1447–e1463.
  • Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. 2013. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 35:e1437–e1446.
  • Malau-Aduli BS, Teague PA, D’Souza K, Heal C, Turner R, Garne DL, van der Vleuten C. 2017. A collaborative comparison of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) standard setting methods at Australian medical schools. Med Teach. 39: 1261–1267.
  • Malau-Aduli BS, Teague PA, Turner R, Holman B, D’Souza K, Garne D, Heal C, Heggarty P, Hudson JN, Wilson IG, et al. 2015. Improving assessment practice through cross-institutional collaboration: an exercise on the use of OSCEs. Med Teach. 38:1–271.
  • Messick S. 1989. Validity. In: Linn R, editor. Educational measurement. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan; p. 13–104.
  • Miller GE. 1990. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 65:S63–S67.
  • Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, Guest CB. 2001. A comparison of global ratings and checklist scores from an undergraduate assessment using an anesthesia simulator. Acad Med. 76:1053–1055.
  • Nestel D, Tierney T, Kubacki A. 2008. Creating authentic simulated patient roles: working with volunteers. Med Educ. 42:1122.
  • Newble D. 2004. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ. Educ 38:199–203.
  • Newble DI, Hoare J, Sheldrake PF. 1980. The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations. Med Educ. 14:345–349.
  • Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33:206–214.
  • Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. 2013. Advancing the objective structured clinical examination: sequential testing in theory and practice. Med Educ. 47:569–577.
  • Roberts C, Newble D, Jolly B, Reed M, Hampton K. 2006. Assuring the quality of high-stakes undergraduate assessments of clinical competence. Med Teach. 28:535–543.
  • Shirazi M, Labaf A, Monjazebi E, Jalili M, Mirzazadeh M, Ponzer S, Masiello I. 2014. Assessing medical students’ communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients’ quality assurance. Acad Psychiatry. 38:354–360.
  • Shumway JM, Harden RM. Association for Medical Education in Europe. 2003. AMEE Guide No. 25: the assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Med Teach. 25:569–584.
  • Smee S. 2003. Skill based assessment. BMJ. 326:703–706.
  • Swanwick T. 2014. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Turner JL, Dankoski ME. 2008. Objective structured clinical exams: a critical review. Fam Med. 40:574–578.
  • van der Vleuten CP, van Luyk SJ, van Ballegooijen AM, Swanson DB. 1989. Training and experience of examiners. Med Educ. 23:290–296.
  • Wilkinson TJ, Frampton CM, Thompson-Fawcett M, Egan T. 2003. Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment. Acad Med. 78:219–223.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.