Marking parties for marking written assessments: A spontaneous community of practice

References

• Andreassen P, Christensen MK, Møller JE. 2020. Focused ethnography as an approach in medical education research. Med Educ. 54(4):296–302. doi: 10.1111/medu.14045. 31850537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). 2017. Improving documentation at transitions of care for complex patients. Sydney, NSW: ACSQHC; p. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Boulet JR, Rebbecchi TA, Denton EC, McKinley DW, Whelan GP. 2004. Assessing the written communication skills of medical school graduates. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 9(1):47–60. doi: 10.1023/B:AHSE.0000012216.39378.15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LW, Adendorff HJ, Herman N, Van der Vleuten CP. 2010. The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students’ learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 15(5):695–715. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9232-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauser BE, Harik P, Margolis MJ, Mee J, Swygert K, Rebbecchi T. 2008. The generalizability of documentation scores from the USMLE step 2 clinical skills examination. Acad Med. 83(10 Suppl):S41–S44. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183cd1d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. 2018. Medicine as a community of practice: implications for medical education. Acad Med. 93(2):185–191. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho-Filho MA, Tio RA, Steinert Y. 2020. Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Medical Teacher. 42(2):143–149. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing S. 2010. Assessment in health professions education. London: Routledge Ltd. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552782.
   Google Scholar
• Govaerts MJ, van der Vleuten CP, Holmboe ES. 2019. Managing tensions in assessment: moving beyond either–or thinking. Med Educ. 53(1):64–75. doi: 10.1111/medu.13656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeneman S, de Jong LH, Dawson LJ, Wilkinson TJ, Ryan A, Tait GR, Rice N, Torre D, Freeman A, van der Vleuten CPM. 2021. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment–1. Agreement on the principles. Med Teach. 43(10):1139–1148. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hift RJ. 2014. Should essays and other “open-ended”-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine? BMC Med Educ. 14(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0249-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson JM, Rowlands T. 2012. The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth interviewing. In: Gubrium, JF, Holstein JA, Marvasti AB, McKinney KD, editors. The SAGE handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks: Sage; p. 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Khan KZ, Gaunt K, Ramachandran S, Pushkar P. 2013. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part II: organisation & administration. Med Teach. 35(9):e1447–e1463. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michell V, Tehrani J, Liu K. 2012. Are clinical documents optimised for patient safety? A critical analysis of patient safety outcomes using the EDA error model. Health Policy Technol. 1(4):214–227. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33(3):206–214. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Hays R, Palacios Mackay MF, Roberts T, Swanson D. 2018. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 40(11):1102–1109. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 42(5):533–544. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C. 2005. Conducting ethnography in medical settings. Med Educ. 39(12):1180–1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02330.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price M. 2005. Assessment standards: the role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 30(3):215–230.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. 2020. NVivo (released in March 2020). https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.
   Google Scholar
• Rawson RE, Quinlan KM, Cooper BJ, Fewtrell C, Matlow JR. 2005. Writing-skills development in the health professions. Teach Learn Med. 17(3):233–238. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1703_6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Peller J, Goldman J, Kitto S. 2013. Ethnography in qualitative educational research: AMEE Guide No. 80. Med Teach. 35(8):e1365–e1379. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.804977. 23808715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 52(4):1893–1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonheim‐Klein M, Muijtjens A, Habets L, Manogue M, Van Der Vleuten C, Van der Velden U. 2009. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods. Eur J Dent Educ. 13(3):162–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00568.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulruf B, Adelstein B-A, Damodaran A, Harris P, Kennedy S, O'Sullivan A, Taylor S. 2018. Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1382-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh T. 2021. Principles of assessment in medical education. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. 2017. The foundations of measurement and assessment in medical education. Med Teach. 39(10):1010–1015. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1359521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer JJ, Kirschner PA. 2017. Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design: New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox CR, Vaccari E, Whitehurst L, Davey M, McManus B, Hunt P. 2020. The clinical summary exam: a novel approach to assessing information processing skills and improving preparedness for starting work among final-year medical students. Med Teach. 42(5):591–592. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1646416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeates P, Moult A, Cope N, McCray G, Xilas E, Lovelock T, Vaughan N, Daw D, Fuller R, McKinley RKB. 2021. Measuring the effect of examiner variability in a multiple-circuit objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Acad Med. 96(8):1189–1196. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yepes-Rios M, Dudek N, Duboyce R, Curtis J, Allard RJ, Varpio L. 2016. The failure to fail underperforming trainees in health professions education: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 42. Med Teach. 38(11):1092–1099. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkowsky R, Park YS, Hyderi A, Bordage G. 2015. Characteristics and implications of diagnostic justification scores based on the new patient note format of the USMLE Step 2 CS exam. Acad Med. 90(11 Suppl):S56–S62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar