![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
- Boyd C. and Francome C. (1983) One Birth in Nine: Caesarean Section Trends Since 1978. London, Maternity Alliance.
- Chamberlain G. V. (1993) What is the correct caesarean section rate? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 100, 403-404.
- Chamberlain G. and Chamberlain R. (Eds) (1972) British Births Vol 1. London, Heinemann Medical Books.
- Clarke S. C. and Taffel S. M. (1996) Rates of cesarean and VBAC delivery, United States 1994. Birth, 23, 166-168.
- Department of Health and Human Services (1991) Healthy People 2000. DHSS Publications No (PHS) 91-50212 Washington DC.
- Department of Health Statistical Bulletin (1997) NHS Maternity Statistics 1989-90 to 1994-95.
- ENB (1999) Report of the Audit of Midwifery Practice 1998. London, English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting.
- FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health (1999) International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 64, 317-322.
- Hannah M. and Hannah W. (1996) Caesarean section or vaginal birth for breech presentation at term. We need better evidence as to which is better. British Medical Journal, 312, 1433-1434.
- Joffe J., Chapple J., Paterson C. and Beard R. (1994) What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 48, 406-411.
- Kiwanuka A. I. and Moore W. M. (1987) The changing incidence of caesarean section in the health district of Central Manchester. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 94, 440-444.
- Leitch C. R. and Walker J. J. (1998) The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 621-626.
- Mackenzie I. Z. (1999) Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them? British Medical Journal, 318, 1070.
- Murray S. E. and Serani-Pradenas F. (1997) Caesarean birth trends in Chile 1986-94. Birth, 24, 258-263.
- National Institutes of Health (1981) Ceasarean Childbirth Report of a Consensus Conference. NIH publication 82-2067 NIH Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
- Pal M., Sundaram P., Radhakrishnan K. K., Thomas K. and Muliyil J. P. (1999) A high rate of caesarean section in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern? National Medical Journal of India, 12, 156-158.
- Panel and Planning Committee of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth (1986) Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 134, 1348-1352.
- Paterson-Brown S. and Fisk N. M. (1999) Caesarean section: every woman's right to choose? Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 9, 351-355.
- Rhydhstrom H., Ingemarsson I. and Ohrlander S. (1990) Lack of correlation between a high caesarean rate and improved prognosis for low birth weight twins. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 97, 229-233.
- Robson M. S., Scudamore I. W. and Walsh S. M. (1996) Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 174, 199-205.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1999) Planning for the Future Consultants in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A discussion Document, London, RCOG Press.
- Savage W. (1990) The rising caesarean section rate: anxiety not science. In: Obstetrics for the 1990s: Current Controversies, edited by T. Chard and M. P. M. Richards. London, Clinics in Developmental Medicine, McKeith Press.
- Savage W. (1997) Is it so difficult to define an optimal caesarean rate for a population? Health Policy report for the MSc in Public Health from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Copies available for _GCP_5 including postage and packing. Cheques to Contingency Fund OBG979 c/o Wendy Savage, 3rd Floor Grocers Attic, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1BB.
- Savage W. and Francome C. (1993) British caesarean section rates: have we reached a plateau? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 100, 493-496.
- Scottish Health Services (1997) Births in Scotland 19761995. Edinburgh, Information and Statistics Division, Common Services Agency.
- The Audit Commission (1997) First Class Delivery: Improving Maternity Services in England and Wales. Abingdon, Audit Commission Publications.
- The Cumberledge Report (1993) Changing Childbirth, London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
- Treffers P. E., Eskes M., Kleiverda G. and van Alten D. (1990) Home births and minimal medical intervention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 2203-2208.
- Van Roosmalen J. (1999) Elective caesarean section on request. Unnecessary caesarean sections should be avoided. British Medical Journal, 318, 121.
- Wilkinson C., McIlwaine G., Boulton-Jones C. and Cole S. (1998) Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 45-52.
- World Health Organisation (1985) Appropriate technology for Birth. Lancet, ii, 436-437.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume 20, 2000 - Issue 3