71
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 μg) misoprostol for induction of labour: a randomised trial of high vs. low (50 μg) dose misoprostol

, &
Pages 614-617 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

  • Berkus M. D., Langer O., Samueloff A., Xenakis E. M., Field N. T. and Ridgway L. E. (1994) Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: increased risk for adverse neonatal outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 84, 115-120.
  • Blanchette H. A., Nayak S. and Erasmus S. (1999) Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin F1) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 180, 1551-1559.
  • Danielian P., Porter B., Fern N., Summers J. and Templeton A. (1999) Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 106, 793-797.
  • de la Torre S., Gilson G. J., Flores S., Curet L. B., Quails C. E. and Rayburn W. F. (2001) Is high-dose misoprostol able to lower the incidence of cesarean section? A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Maternal and Fetal Medicine 10, 85-90
  • El Refaey H. and Jauniaux E. (1997) Methods of induction of labour. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9, 37-378.
  • El-Sherbiny M. T., El-Gharieb I. H. and Gewely H. A. (2001) Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 72, 20-3.
  • Fletcher H. and Hutchinson S. (2001) A retrospective review of pregnancy outcome after misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) induction of labour. West Indian Medical Journal 50, 47-49.
  • Goldberg A. B., Greenberg M. B. and Darney P. D. (2001) Misoprostol and pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 30-4.
  • Herman J. H. and Kim A. (1999) Current trends in cervical ripening and labor induction. American Family Physician, 60, 477-484.
  • Hofmeyr G. J. (2001) Induction of labour with misoprostol. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13, 577-581.
  • Hofmeyr G. and Gulmezoglu A. M. (2001) Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Online Update Software, 3, CD0000941.
  • Hofmeyr G. J., Gulmezoglu A. M. and Alfirevic Z. (1999) Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 106, 798-803.
  • Howarth G. R., Funk M., Steytler P., Pistorius L., Makin J. and Pattinson R. C. (1996) A randomised controlled trial comparing vaginally administered misoprostol to vaginal dinoprostone gel in labour induction. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 316, 474-478.
  • Mahomed K., Nyoni R. and Masona D. (1994) Meconium staining of the liquor in a low risk population. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 8, 292-300.
  • Mathews J. E., Mathai M. and George A. (2000) Uterine rupture in a multiparous woman during labor induction with oral misoprostol. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 68, 4-44.
  • Morey S. S. (2000) ACOG develops guidelines for induction of labor. American Family Physician, 62, 445.
  • Ngai S. W., Chan Y. M., Lam S. W. and Lao T. T. (2000) Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 107, 222-227.
  • Sanchez-Ramos L. and Kaunitz A. M. (2000) Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review of the literature. Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 43, 475-488.
  • Sanchez-Ramos L. Kaunitz A. M., Wears R. L., Delke L. and Gaudier F. L. (1997) Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 89, 633-642.
  • Sciscione A. C., Nguyen L., Manley J., Pollock M., Maas B. and Colmorgen G. (2001) A randomised comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 97, 603-607.
  • Wing D. A. and Paul R. H. (1996) A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175, 158-164.
  • Wing D. A., Jones M. M., Rahall A., Goodwin T. M. and Paul R. H. (1995a) A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 172, 1804-1810
  • Wing D. A., Rahall A., Jones M. M., Goodwin T. M. and Paul R. H. (1995b) Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical opening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 172, 1811-1816.
  • Ziadeh S. M. and Sunna F. (2000) Obstetric and pen natal outcome of pregnancies with term labour and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 264, 84-87.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.