![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
Reference
- Ezechi 0.C., Fasubaa O.B. and Dare F.O. (2000) Socio-economic barriers to safe method among booked patients in rural Nigerian communities. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 20, 32— 34.
- Goldberg A.B., Greenberg M.B. and Darney P.D. (2001) Mosoprostol and pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 38–47.
- Gunlap S. and Bildiric I. (2000) The effect of pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour. Acta Obstetricia et Gynaecologica Scandinavica, 79, 283–287.
- Kwawukume E.Y. and Ayertey R.P. (2002) The use of misoprostol for induction of labour in a low resource setting. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 19, 78–81.
- Majoko F., Nystrom L. and Lindmark G. (2002) No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 mcg) misoprostol for induction of labour. A randomised trial of high versus low (50 mcg) dose misoprostol. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecol-ogy, 22, 614–617.
- Ramsey P.S., Ogburn P.L., Harris D.Y., Heirse R.H. and Ramin K.D. (2000) Effect of vaginal PH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182, 1616 — 1619.
- Wing D.A., Park M.R. and Paul P.H. (2000) A randomised comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95, 905 — 908.