Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institution in Nigeria

References

• Abdel Aziz A. (2000) Vaginal birth after primary caesarean section: impact on maternal and perinatal outcome. Egyptian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26, 271 —283.
   Google Scholar
• Adeleye J.A. (1981) Caesarean section in University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria: a reappraisal (1977— 1978). Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2, 61 — 71.
   Google Scholar
• Adeleye J.A. (1982) A two-year study of caesarean section and perinatal mortality at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. East African Medical Journal, 59, 383 — 389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adjahoto E.O., Ekouevi D.K. and Hodonou K.A. (2001) Factors predicting outcome of trial of labour after prior caesarean section in developing countries. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 30, 174— 179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aisien A.O., Lawson J.0. and Okolo A. (2000) Two-year study of perinatal mortality in Jos, Nigeria. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 71, 171–173.
   Google Scholar
• Aisien A.O., Lawson J.0. and Adebayo A.A. (2002) A five year appraisal of caesarean section in a Northern Nigeria University Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Postgraduate Medi-cal Journal, 9, 146–150.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Chalabi K.A. (1997) Trial of labour after caesarean birth in Iraq. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 58, 241— 242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1995) Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean birth. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 52, 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton B., Targett C., Rasmussen M., Readman E., Sale F. and Permezel M. (2000) Vaginal birth after caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study. VBAC Study Group. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 40, 87 — 91.
   Google Scholar
• Boulvain M., Fraser W.D., Brisson-Carroll G., Faron G. and Wollast E. (1997) Trial of labour after caesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 104, 1385–1390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biswas A. (2003) Management of previous caesarean section. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15, 123— 129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case D.B., Corcoran R., Jeffcoate N. and Randle G.H. (1971) Caesarean section and its place in modern obstetric practice. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 78, 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson J. (1999) Previous caesarean section. In: High Risk Pregnancy: management options, edited by James D.K., Steer P.J. and Weiner C.P., 2nd edn, pp. 1205–1216. London, Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• D'Orsi E., Chor D., Giffin K., Barbosa G.P. and Angulo-Tuesta A.J. (2001) Factors associated with vaginal birth after caesarean in a maternity hospital of Rio de Janeiro. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 97, 152 — 157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkin M. (1989) Labour and delivery after caesarean section. In: Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, edited by Chalmers I., Enkin M. and Keirse M.J.N.C., Volume 2, pp. 1196–1215. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer R.M., Kirschbaum T., Potter D., Strong T.H. and Medearis A.L. (1991) Uterine rupture during trial of labour after previous caesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165, 996–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Government Statistical Service (1997) National Health Service maternity statistics, England 1989— 1990 and 1994— 1995. Department of Health Statistical Bulletin, 1, 1— 50.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison K.A., Lister U.G., Rossiter C.E. and Chong H. (1985) Perinatal mortality child bearing health and social priorities. A survey of 22774 consecutive hospital births in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecol-ogy Supplement, 5, 66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jones R.O., Nagashima A.W., Hartnett-Goodman M.M. and Goodlin R.C. (1991) Rupture of low transverse cesarean scars during trial of labour. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 77, 815— 817.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S. and Maouris P. (1996) Induction of labour for trial of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a remote district hospital. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 36, 417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S.F. and Sidek S. (1993) Delivery after a lower segment caesarean section. Singapore Medical Journal, 34, 62— 66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung AS., Farmer R.M., Leung E.K., Medearis A.L. and Paul R.H. (1993) Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labour after caesarean delivery: a case—control study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 168, 1358— 1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas J. and Enkin M. (1989) Variation in operative delivery rates. In: Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, edited by Chalmers I., Enkin M. and Keirse M.J.N.C., Volume 2, pp. 1182— 1195. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell R. (1996) Vaginal delivery after caesarean section: factors influencing success rates. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36, 4–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R. and Martin D.P. (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labour among women with a prior caesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry J.A. (1969) The management of patients previously delivered by caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 76, 137— 143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMahon M.J., Luther ER., Bowes W.A. Jr and Olshan A.F. (1996) Comparison of a trial of labour with an elective second caesarean section. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notzon F.C., Placek P.J. and Taffel C.M. (1987) Comparisons of national caesarean section rates. New England Journal of Medicine, 316, 386–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obara H., Minakami H., Koike T., Takamizawa S., Matsubara S. and Sato I. (1998) Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: results of 310 pregnancies. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Research, 24, 129— 134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ola ER., Imosemi O.D. and Abudu O.O. (2001) Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section: evaluation of predictive factors. African Journal of Medical Science, 30, 61 — 66.
   Google Scholar
• Okonofua FE., Makinde ON. and Ayangade S.O. (1988) Yearly trends in caesarean section and mortality in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1, 31–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okpere E.E., Oronsaye A.U. and Imoedemhe D.A.G. (1982) Pregnancy and delivery after caesarean section: a review of 494 cases. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3, 45 — 48.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson C. and Saunders N.J. (1991) Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. British Medical Journal, 303, 818— 821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perveen F. and Shah Q. (1997) Obstetrics outcome after one previous caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynae-cological Research, 23, 341–346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickhardt M.G., Martin J.N. Jr, Meydrech E.F., Blake PG., Martin R.W., Perry K.G. Jr and Morrison J.C. (1992) Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 166, 1811— 1815.
   Google Scholar
• Rageth J.C., Juzi C. and Grossenbacher H. (1999) Delivery after previous caesarean section: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 93, 332— 337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J.R. (1991) Mandatory trial of labour after caesarean delivery: an alternative viewpoint. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 77, 811 — 814.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle P.J. and Chamberlain J.A. (2002) Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a rural African setting. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 77, 31 —32.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Walt WA., Cronje H.S. and Bam R.H. (1994) Vaginal delivery after one caesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 46, 271 —277.
   Google Scholar
• Van Roosmalen J. (1991) Vaginal birth after caesarean section in rural Tanzania. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 34, 211 — 215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C., McIlwaine G., Boulton-Jones C. and Cole S. (1998) Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (1996) Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Program. Perinatal mortality a listing of available information. WHO 1996/FRH/MSM/96.7.
   Google Scholar
• Zelop CM., Shipp T.D., Repke J.T., Cohen A., Caughey A.B. and Lieberman E. (1999) Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labour in gravid women with one prior caesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181, 882— 886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar