Semen providers and their three families

References

• Daniels KR, Lalos O. The Swedish Insemination Act and the availability of donors. Human Reproduction 1995; 10:1871–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygdeman M. The Swedish Insemination Act. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1991; 70:265–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SOSFS. The National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden; 1987. pp 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sverne T. Children conceived by Artificial Insemination. Summary of a report of the Insemination Committee, Swedish Insemination Committee; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sverne T. Bio-technological developments and the law. International Social Science Journal 1990; 42:465–473.
   Google Scholar
• Edvinsson A, Forsman L, Nordsfors G. Givarinsemination vid manlig infertilitet-slut pa en epok? (Donor insemination for male infertility-the end of an era?). Lakartidningen 1990; 87:1871–1872.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagenfeldt K. Givarinsemination behandlingsmetod i kris. (Donor insemination: a treatment in crisis.) Lakartidningen 1990;87:1849–1850.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes. Human Reproduction 2000; 15:2052–2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad F, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. To tell or not to tell-what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics&Gynecology 2000; 21:193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Klock SC, Jacob MC, Maier D. A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: secrecy, privacy, and disclosure. Fertility and Sterility 1994; 62:477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewaeys A. Donor insemination: the impact on family and child development. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics&Gynecology 1996; 17:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nactigall RD, Pitcher L, Tschann JM, Quiroga SS, et al. Stigma, disclosure and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertility and Sterility 1997; 68:83–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schover LR, Collins RL, Richards S. Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples. Fertility and Sterility 1992; 57:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schover LR, Greenhalgh LF, Richards SL, Collins RL. Psychological screening and the success of donor insemination. Human Reproduction 1994; 9:176–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lalos A, Daniels KR, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden. Human Reproduction 2003; 18:212–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels KR, Ericsson HL, Burn IP. Families and donor insemination: the views of semen donors. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 1996; 5:229–237.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels KR, Ericsson HL, Burn IP. The views of donors regarding the Swedish Insemination Act. Medical Law International 1998; 3:117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Lorbach C. Let the offspring speak. In: Lorbach C, editor. The Donor Issues Forum. NSW: The Donor Conception Support Group of Australia Inc.; 1997. p 182.
   Google Scholar
• Turner AJ, Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction 2000; 15:2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs GT, Clayton CE, McGowan P. The attitudes of semen donors. Clinical Reproduction and Fertility 1983; 2:397–399.
   Google Scholar
• Lui SC, Weaver SM. Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Human Reproduction 1996; 11:2061–2066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen B, Neilsen AF, Lauritsen JG. Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Sperm donors-their motivations and attitudes to artificial insemination. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1994; 73:701–705.
   Google Scholar
• Lui SC, Weaver SM, Robinson J, Debono M, Neiland M, Kilick SR, Hay DM. A survey of semen donor attitudes. Human Reproduction 1995; 10:234–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schover LR, Rothmann SA, Collins RL. The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors. Human Reproduction 1992; 7:575–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings G. Measuring the welfare of the child: in search of the appropriate evaluation principle. Human Reproduction 2000; 14:1146–1150.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels KR, Hall DJ. Semen donor recruitment: strategies for a non-payment based approach. Human Reproduction 1997; 12:2330–2335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdie RA, Peek JC, Irwin R, Ellis J, Graham FM, Fisher PR. Identifiable semen donors-attitudes of donors and recipient couples. New Zealand Medical Journal 1992; 105:27–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar