References
- Ulmann A, Silvestre L, Chemama L, Rezvani Y, Renault M, Aguillaume CJ, Baulieu EE. Medical termination of early pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) followed by a prostaglandin analogue. Study in 16,369 women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1992; 71(4):278–283.
- Baird DT, Sukcharoen N, Thong KJ. Randomized trial of misoprostol and cergem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion. Human Reproduction 1995; 10(6):1521–1527.
- Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Westhoff C, Ellertson C, Eisinger SH, Stadalius LS, Fuller S. Vaginal misoprostol administered 1, 2 or 3 days after mifepristone for early medical abortion. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 284(15):1948–1953.
- Ashok PW, Penney GC, Flett GM, Templeton A. An effective regimen for early medical abortion: a report of 2000 consecutive cases. Human Reproduction 1998; 13(10):2962–2965.
- Stotland N. The Myth of the Abortion Trauma Syndrome. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 1992; 268(15):2078–2079.
- Bracken MB, Klerman LV, Bracken M. Abortion, adoption, or motherhood: an empirical study of decision-making during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics&Gynecology 1978; 130(3):251–262.
- Cohen L, Roth S. Coping with abortion. Journal of Human Stress 1984; 10(3):140–145.
- Lazarus A. Psychiatric sequelae of legalized elective first trimester abortion. Journal of Psychosomic Obstetrics&Gynecology 1985; 4:141–150.
- Robbins JM, DeLamater JD. Support from significant others and loneliness following induced abortion. Social Psychiatry 1985; 20(2):92–99.
- Rogers JL, Stoms GB, Phifer JL. Psychological impact of abortion: methodological and outcomes summary of empirical research between 1966 and 1988. Health Care for Women International 1989; 10(4):347–376.
- Zolese G, Blacker CV. The psychological complications of therapeutic abortion. British Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 160:742–749.
- Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. Psychological factors in abortion. A review. The American Psychologist 1992; 47(10):1194–1204.
- Bachelot A, Cludy L, Spira A. Conditions for choosing between drug induced and surgical abortions. Contraception 1992; 45(6):547–559.
- Urquhart DR, Templeton AA. Psychiatric morbidity and acceptability following medical and surgical methods of induced abortion. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991; 98(4):396–399.
- Henshaw R, Naji S, Russell I, Templeton A. Psychological responses following medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) and surgical vacuum aspiration. A patient centered, partially randomised prospective study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1994; 73(10):812–818.
- Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton A. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women’s preferences and acceptability of treatment. British Medical Journal 1993; 307(6906):714–717.
- Slade P, Heke S, Fletcher J, Stewart P. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care. British Journal of Obstetrics&Gynaecology 1998; 105(12):1288–1295.
- Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden. Schwangerschaftsabbruch. Mitteilungen fü r die Presse. http://www.destatis.de.
- Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983; 67:361–370.
- Horowitz MJ, Wilner N, Alvarez W. IES: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine 1979; 41(3):209–218.
- Herrmann C, Buss U, Snaith RP. HADS-D: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Deutsche Version. Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Verlag Hans Huber; 1995.