The accuracy of risk scores in predicting preterm birth—a systematic review

References

• Akhtar J. and Sehgal N.N. (1980) Prognostic value of a prepartum and intrapartum risk-scoring method. Southern Medical Journal, 73, 411–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba'aqeel H.S., Jabbar F.A., Al-Meshari A.A.A., Facharzt A.A.A. and Kiddes E.A. (1989) Antenatal risk scoring form: statistical analysis of 1175 cases. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 9, 140–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund A. and Lindmark G. (1999) The usefulness of initial risk assessment as a predictor of pregnancy complications and premature delivery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 78, 871 — 876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., Gatsonis CA., Glasziou P.P., Irwig L.M., Lijmer J.G., Moher D., Rennie D. and de Vet H.C. (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. British Medical Journal, 326, 41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creasy R.K., Gummer B.A. and Liggins G.C. (1980) System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55, 692–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R. and Laird N. (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clinical Trials, 7, 177— 188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edenfield S.M., Thomas S.D., Thompson W.O. and Marcotte J.J. (1995) Validity of the Creasy risk appraisal instrument for prediction of preterm labor. Nursing Research, 44, 76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedrick J. (1976) Antenatal identification of women at high risk of spontaneous pre-term birth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 83, 351–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn CA., Helwig A.L. and Meurer L.N. (1999) Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy and the risk of prematurity—a meta-analysis. Journal of Family Practice, 48, 885–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzick D.S., Daikoku N.H. and Kaltreider D.F. (1984) Predictability of pregnancy outcome in preterm delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 63, 645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook R.H. Jr, Laros R.K. Jr and Creasy R.K. (1989) Evaluation of a risk-scoring system for prediction of preterm labor. American Journal of Perinatology, 6, 62— 68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honest H., Bachmann L.M., Coomarasamy A., Gupta J.K., Kleijnen J. and Khan K.S. (2003a) Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22, 305–322.
   Google Scholar
• Honest H., Bachmann L.M. and Khan K. (2003b) Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 107, 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Honest H. and Khan K.S. (2002) Systematic reviews of test accuracy studies in reproductive health. WHO Reproductive Health Library, No. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey M.D. (1995) The beneficial use of risk scoring in a remote and high-risk pregnant population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 35, 139–143.
   Google Scholar
• Irwig L., Tostenson A.N.A., Gatsonis C., Lau J., Colditz G., Chalmers T.C. and Mosteller F. (1994) Guidelines for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 667–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R., Guyatt G.H. and Sackett D.L. (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271, 703–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski M., Goujard J. and Rumeau-Rouquette C. (1973) Prediction of low birthweight and prematurity by a multiple regression analysis with maternal characteristics known since the beginning of the pregnancy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2, 195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirse M.J. (1989) An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. American Journal of Perinatology, 6, 226–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KS., ter Riet G., Popay J., Nixon J. and Kleijnen J. (2001) Study quality assessment (phase 5): conducting the review (stage II). In: CRD report no. 4. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. Last accessed 20 April 2003. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/ inst/crd/report4.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lambotte R. (1977) Discussion on preterm labour. Proceedings of the 5th Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, edited by Anderson, A., pp. 40–41. London, RCOG.
   Google Scholar
• Lijmer J.G., Mol B.W., Heisterkamp S., Bonsel G.J., Prins M.H., van der Meulen J.H. and Bossuyt P.M. (1999) Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1061–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilford R.J. and Chard T. (1983) Problems and pitfalls of risk assessment in antenatal care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 90, 507–510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Main D.M., Richardson D., Gabbe S.G., Strong S. and Weller S.C. (1987) Prospective evaluation of a risk scoring system for predicting preterm delivery in black inner city women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 69, 61— 66.
   Google Scholar
• Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Ventura S.J., Menacker F., Park M.M. and Sutton P.D. (2002) Births: final data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Report, 51, 1–102.
   Google Scholar
• Maternal and Child Health Consortium (1999) 6th Annual Report: Confidential Enquiries into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI). London, MCHRC.
   Google Scholar
• McLean M., Bisits A., Davies J., Walters W., Hackshaw A., De Voss K. and Smith R. (1999) Predicting risk of preterm delivery by second-trimester measurement of maternal plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone and alpha-fetopro-tein concentrations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181, 207 — 215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer B.M., Goldenberg R.L., Das A., Moawad A.H., lams J.D., Meis P.J., Copper R.L., Johnson F., Thom E., McNellis D., Miodovnik M., Menard M.K., Caritis S.N., Thurnau G.R., Bottoms S.F. and Roberts J. (1996) The preterm prediction study: a clinical risk assessment system. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 174, 1885— 1893.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller-Heubach E. and Guzick D.S. (1989) Evaluation of risk scoring in a preterm birth prevention study of indigent patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 160, 829— 835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt R.E. Jr and Aubry R.H. (1969) High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 972–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J., Goldenberg R.L., Davis R.O., Kirk K.A. and Copper R.L. (1990) Evaluation of a risk scoring system as a predictor of preterm birth in an indigent population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 163, 873–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneth N.S. (1995) The problem of low birth weight. Future Children, 5, 19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papiernik-Berkhauer E. (1969) [Coefficient of premature delivery risk (CPDR)] [in French]. Presse Medicale, 77, 793— 794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross M.G., Hobel C.J., Bragonier J.R., Bear M.B. and Bemis R.L. (1986) A simplified risk-scoring system for prematurity. American Journal of Perinatology, 3, 339–344.
   Google Scholar
• Shiono P.H. and Klebanoff M.A. (1993) A review of risk scoring for preterm birth. Clinics in Perinatolology, 20, 107–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song F., Khan KS., Dinnes J. and Sutton A.J. (2002) Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart AL., Rifkin L., Amess P.N., Kirkbride V., Townsend J.P., Miller D.H., Lewis S.W., Kingsley D.P., Moseley IF., Foster 0. and Murray R.M. (1999) Brain structure and neurocognitive and behavioural function in adolescents who were born very preterm. Lancet, 353, 1653–1657.
   Google Scholar
• Wall E.M. (1988) Assessing obstetric risk. A review of obstetric risk-scoring systems. Journal of Family Practice, 27, 153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson E.W. and Sill H.K. (1973) Identification of the high risk pregnancy by a scoring system. New Zealand Medical Journal, 78, 437 —440.
   Google Scholar
• Wolke D. and Meyer R. (1999) Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6-year-old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 94–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar