A free-standing low-risk maternity unit in the United Kingdom: does it have a role?

References

• Albers L.L. and Katz V.L. (1991) Birth setting for low risk pregnancies. Journal ofNurse-Midwifery, 36, 215–220. American Academy of Paediatrics and Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1992) Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 3rd edn. Elk Grove Village, American Academy of Paediatrics. Anonymous (1986) Home, hospital or birthroom? Lancet, 2, 494 — 496.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R. and Macfarlane A. (1986) Place of delivery; a review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93, 675— 683.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R. and Macfarlane A. (1994) Where to be Born? The Debate and the Evidence, 2nd edn. Oxford, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman M.G., Jones M., Spring J.E., De Swiet M., and Chamberlain G.V. (1986) The use of birthroom; a rando-mised controlled trial comparing delivery with that in the labour ward. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93, 182 — 187.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (1993) Changing Childbirth; the Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London, HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman E. and Hurst M. (1987) Outcomes and procedures in low risk birth. A comparison of hospital and birth centre settings. Birth, 14, 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Health Committee on Maternity Services (1992) Winterton Report. London, HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hundley V.A., Cruickshank F.M., Lang G.D., Glazener C.M.A., Milne J.M., Turner M., Blyth D., Molloson J. and Donaldson C. (1994) Midwife managed delivery unit; a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care. British Medical Journal, 309, 1400 — 1403.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M., Llyod I., Redman C., Bull M. and Turnbull A.C. (1983) A comparison of low risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care; shared care and integrated general practice unit. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 90, 118–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law Y.Y. and Lam K.Y. (1999) A randomised controlled trial comparing midwife managed case and obstetrician managed care for women assessed to be at low risk in the initial intrapartum period. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Research, 25, 107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman E. and Ryan K.J. (1989) Birthday choices. New England Journal of Medicine, 321, 1824–1825.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood T.A. (2003) Evaluation of an experimental midwife led unit in Scotland. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 23, 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews J. and Zadak K. (1991) The alternative birth movement in United States; history and current status. Women and Health, 17, 39–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moster, D., Markestad T and Lie R.T. (2000) Assessing quality of obstetric care for low risk deliveries; methodological problems in the use of population based mortality data. Acta Obstetricia et Gynaecologica Scandinavica, 79, 478 —484.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) (1992) Response to the Report of the House of Commons Health Committee on Maternity Services. London: RCOG.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer J.A.D. (1994) Electronic fetal monitoring in the United Kingdom. Birth, 21, 106–107.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor G.W., Edgar W., Taylor BA. and Neal D.G. (1980) How safe is general practitioner obstetrics? Lancet, ii, 1287 — 1289.
   Google Scholar
• Tew M. (1986) Do obstetric intranatal interventions make birth safer? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93, 659 — 674.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall V.R. (Chair) (1995) Women in Normal Labour: a Report of a CSAG Committee on Women in Normal Labour. London, HMSO/ World Health Organisation (WHO) Regional Office for Europe (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh D. (1989) Comparison of management and outcome of labour under two systems of care. Midwives' Chronicle and Nursing Notes, 270–273.
   Google Scholar
• Williams F.L.R., Florey C.V., Ogston S.A., Patel N.B., Howie P.W. and Tindall V.R. (1998) UK study of intrapartum care for low risk primigravidae; a survey of interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 494— 500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO) (1976) Recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Recommended by FIGC as amended October 14, 1976. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 56, 247–253.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (WHO) (1985) Having a Baby in Europe. Public Health in Europe 26. Copenhagen, WHO.
   Google Scholar