112
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Obstetrics

The first 18 months of a new perineal trauma clinic

, , &
Pages 399-402 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

References

  • Adams E.J. and Fernando R.J. (2001) Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears following vaginal delivery. Green Top Guidelines, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 29, 1–8.
  • Bek K.M. and Lauberg S. (1992) Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 99, 724— 726.
  • Faltin D.L. Sangalli M.R. Roche B., Floris L., Boulvain M. and Weil A. (2001) Does a second delivery increase the risk of anal incontinence? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynae-cology, 108, 684 — 688.
  • Fynes M., Donnelly V., Behan M., O'Connell P.R. and O'Herlihy C. (1993) Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study. Lancet, 354, 983–986.
  • Keighley M.R.B., Radley S. and Johanson J. (2000) Consensus on prevention and management of post-obstetric bowel incontinence and third degree tear. Clinical Risk, 6, 231 —237.
  • Lal M., Mann C.H., Callender R. and Radley S. (2003) Does cesarean delivery prevent anal incontinence? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101, 305–312.
  • Leigh R. J. and Turnberg L.A. (1982) Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet, 1, 1349–1351.
  • MacArthur C., Bick D.E. and Keighley M.R. (1997) Faecal incontinence after childbirth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 104, 46–50.
  • Sultan A.H., Kamm MA., Hudson C.N. and Bartram C.I. (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. British Medical Journal, 308, 887— 891.
  • Vaizey C.J., Carapeti, E., Cahill, J.A. and Kamm M.A. (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut, 44, 77–80.
  • Walsh C.J., Mooney E.F., Upton G.J. and Motson R.W. (1996) Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair. British Journal of Surgery, 83, 218— 221.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.