Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Volume 25, 2005 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
25
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Obstetrics

Does discussion of possible scar rupture influence preferred mode of delivery after a caesarean section?

Shyamaly Sur Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
&
IZ MacKenzie Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
Pages 338-341 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

References

  • AGOG Committee of Obstetrics. 1988. Guidelines for vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean section. AGOG Committee Opinion. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
  • Department of Health. 1993. Changing Childbirth Part I: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
  • Enkin M. 1989. Labour and delivery following previous caesarean section. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 1196–1215.
  • General Medical Council. 2001. Good Medical Practice. Protect-ing Patients, Guiding Doctors. London: General Medical Council.
  • Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL,, Easterling TR, Martin DP. 2001. Risk of uterine rupture during labour among women with a prior caesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 345:3 — 8.
  • MacKenzie IZ. 1991. Prostaglandin induction and the scarred uterus. In: Keirse MJNC, Elder MG. Induction of Labour: Special Issues. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, pp 29— 39.
  • MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I, Annan B. 2003. Indications for caesarean section in a consultant unit over three decades. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 23:233–238.
  • McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. 1996. Comparison of a trial of labour with an elective second cesarean section. New England Journal of Medicine 335:689 — 695.
  • Molloy BG, Sheil O, Duignan NM. 1987. Delivery after Caesarean Section. British Medical Journal 294:1645–1647.
  • Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. 2000. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183:1187–1197.
  • Paterson CM, Saunders NJSG. 1991. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. British Medical Journal 303:818–821.
  • Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. 1999. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstetrics and Gynecology 93:332–337.
  • Steer P. 1994. Intrapartum care including the detection and management of fetal dysfunction. In: Clements RV, editor. Safe Practice in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. A Medico-Legal Handbook. London: Churchill Livingstone, pp 191 — 214.
  • Thomas J, Paranjothy S. 2001. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The Na-tional Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.