![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Adewole I F, Franklin O, Matiluko A A. Cervical ripening and induction of labour by breast stimulation. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 1993; 22: 81–86
- American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists (ACOG). Induction and augmentation of labour. ACOG Technical Bulletin No 217. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC 1995
- Bishop E H. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1964; 24: 266
- Embrey M P, Mollison B C. The unfavourable cervix and the induction using a cervical balloon. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1967; 74: 44–48
- Ezimokhai M, Nwabineli J M. The use of Foley's catheter in ripening the unfavourable cervix prior to induction of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1980; 87: 281–286
- Kubli F W, Hon E H, Khazin A F, Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in human fetus during labour. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1969; 104: 1190–1206
- Perry K G, Jr, Larmon J E, May W L, Robinette L G, Martin R W. Cervical ripening: A randomised comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 178: 1333–1340
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz A M, Wears R L, Delke I, Gaudier F L. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 89: 633–642
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Kauniz A M, Valle G O Del, Delke I, Schroeder P A, Briones D K. Labour induction with prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomised trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993; 81: 332–336
- St. Onge R D, Connors G T. Pre-induction cervical ripening: A comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995; 172: 687–690
- Tomlinson A J, Archer P A, Hobson S. Induction of labour: A comparison of two methods with particular concern to patient acceptability. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 21: 239–241
- Trofatter K F. Cervical ripening. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 35: 476–486
- Vengalil S H, Guinn D A, Olabi N F, Burd L I, Owen J. A Randomised Trial of Misoprostol and Extra amniotic Saline Infusion for Cervical Ripening and labour induction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 19: 774–779
- Wing A W. Labour induction with misoprostol. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999; 181: 339–345
- Wing D A, Jones M M, Rahall A, Goodwin T M, Paul R H. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for pre-induction cervical ripening and labour induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995; 172: 1804–1810
- Wing D A, Paul R H. A comparison of different dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening and labour induction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 175: 158–164