Surrogacy

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Ethics. Ethical issues in surrogate motherhood. ACOG, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• Appleton T. Surrogacy. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 11: 256–257
   Google Scholar
• JSOG. Association of Japanese muscular dystrophy. Apprehension about surrogacy. 2001, Available at: http://www.jsog.or.jp/kaiin/html/kaikoku/H15_4.html (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• BBC online network. UK legal landmark for gay dads. 1999, Available at: bbc.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• BBC. Surrogate twins-miracle babies. 2004, Available at: bbc.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Blyth E, Potter C. Paying for it? Surrogacy, market forces and assisted conception. Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Ch 15, R Cook, S Sclater, F Kaganas, 2003; 227–242
   Google Scholar
• Brazier M, Campbell A, Golombok S. Surrogacy: review for health ministers of current arrangements for payments and regulation. HMSO, London 1998, Report of the Review Team Cm 4068
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association (BMA). Changing conception of motherhood: The practice of surrogacy in Britain. BMA Publications, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association (BMA). Considering surrogacy? Your question answered. BMA Publications, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Burrell R. Assisted reproduction in the Nordic Countries: a comparative study of policies and regulation. 2005, Nordic Committee on Bioethics
   Google Scholar
• Civil Code of Quebec (CCQ). Art. 53 [ad. 1991, c.64].
   Google Scholar
• Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation. 1987, Vatican City
   Google Scholar
• Golombok S, MacCallum F, Goodman E, Rutter M. Families with children conceived by donor insemination: A follow-up at age 12. Child Development 2002a; 73: 952–968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Giavazzi M T, Guerra D, MacCallum F, Rust J. The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: The transition to adolescence. Human Reproduction 2002b; 17: 830–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok S, Murray C, Brinsden P, Abdalla H. Social versus biological parenting: Family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 1999; 40: 519–527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh A V. Infertility in Jewish couples, biblical and rabbinic law. Human Fertility 1998; 1: 14–19
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons of Canada. 2004. Bill C-6. 3rd Session, 37th Parliament, 52 – 53 Elizabeth II.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Federation of Bar Associations (JFBA). 2000. Available at: http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/jp/katsudo/sytyou/iken/00/2000_11.html (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Joint Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society/Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Report. Ethical issues in assisted reproduction. Journal of the Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canada 1999; 21: 71–74
   Google Scholar
• McCormick R A. Surrogacy: a catholic perspective. Creighton Law Review 1992; 25: 1617–1625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ministry of Health. Measures of administration of human assisted reproductive technologies. 2001, Health Newspaper 6 March: 3
   Google Scholar
• Assisted Reproductive Technology Committee (ARTC). Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare Reproductive medicine accessory section: Account about maintenance of reproductive medicine institution of transplantation of spermatozoon/ovum/embryo. ARTC, Tokyo 2003, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Mufti Allie Haroun Sheik. Islamic principles on family planning. Qasmi Publication. 2003; 150–153, Available at: http://www.central-mosque.com/fiqh/test-tube.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nozawa S, Banno K. Surrogacy. Japan Medical Association Journal 2004; 47: 192–203
   Google Scholar
• Pinkerton T M. Surrogacy and egg donation law in California. The American Surrogacy Center, Inc. (TASC), Kennesaw, GA 1998, Available at: http://www.surrogacy.com/legals/article/calaw.html
   Google Scholar
• Ren-Zong Q. Sociocultural dimensions of infertility and assisted reproduction in the Far East. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. World Health Organisation, GenevaSwitzerland 2002
   Google Scholar
• Rowe P J. Report on the workshop on the standardized investigation of the infertile couple. Proceedings of the XIth World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Dublin. R F Harrison, J Bonnar, W Thompson. MTP Press, Lancaster 1983; 427–442
   Google Scholar
• Schenker J G. Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish law. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 1997; 71: 113–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker J G. Assisted reproductive practice: religious perspectives. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005; 10: 310–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrybman J. Maryland Surrogacy Law. The American Surrogacy Center, Inc. (TASC), Kennesaw, GA 2000, Available at: http://www.surrogacy.com/legals/article/txlaw.html
   Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Antilla V, Sajaneimi N, Tiitinen A, Hovatta O. Health and development of children born after oocyte donation compared with that of those born after in-vitro fertilization, and parents' attitudes regarding secrecy. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 2009–2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soini S, Ibarreta D, Anastasiadou V, Ayme S, Braga S, Cornel M, et al. The interface between medically assisted reproduction and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues. European Journal of Human Genetics 2006; 14: 588–645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern G. Legal status of surrogacy in Texas. The American Surrogacy Center, Inc. (TASC), Kennesaw, GA 2003, Available at: http://www.surrogacy.com/legals/article/txlaw.html
   Google Scholar
• Taylor P. Surrogacy: arrangements and payments. The Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Taylor P. Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: A Public Consultation. Department of Health, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• The Surrogate Parenthood Act 1998. The Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel.
   Google Scholar
• United States New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County. 1987. In: Re: Baby M., 31 March. Annual Review of Population Law 14:60.
   Google Scholar
• United States New Jersey Supreme Court. 1988. Matter of Baby M. Annual Review of Population Law 15:61. [From: 537 A.2d 1227].
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker O. The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 1849–1855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayena E, Rowe P J, Griffin P D. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. World Health Organisation, GenevaSwitzerland 2002
   Google Scholar