Timing of planned repeated caesarean section: An enigma

References

• Abbassi H, el-Karroumi M, Aboulfalah A, Bouhya S, Bekkay M. Trial of labor after 2 cesarean sections. Prospective study of 130 cases. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 1998; 27: 806–810
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias E, MacDorman M F, Strobino D M, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics – 2002. Paediatrics 2003; 112: 1215–1230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretelle F, Cravello L, Shojai R, Roger V, D'ercole C, Blanc B. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2001; 94: 23–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan S P, Magann E F, Wiggs C D, Barrilleaux P S, Martin J N, Jr. Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 100: 946–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guihard P, Blondel B. Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 108: 48–55
   Google Scholar
• Hack M, Fanaroff A A, Klaus M H, Mendelawitz B D, Merkatz I R. Neonatal respiratory distress following elective delivery. A preventable disease?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1976; 126: 43–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr G J, Say L, Gülmezoglu A M. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 1221–1228
   Google Scholar
• Landon M B, Spong C Y, Thom E, Hauth J C, Bloom S L, Varner M W, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 108: 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lema V M, Ojwang S B, Wanjala S H. Rupture of the gravid uterus: a review. East African Medical Journal 1991; 68: 430–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V L, Easterling T R, Martin D P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch C M, Kearney R, Turner M J. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003; 106: 10–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macones G A, Cahill A, Pare E, Stamilio D M, Ratcliffe S, Stevens E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 192: 1223–1228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison J J, Rennie J M, Milton P J. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term; influence of timing of elective caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1995; 102: 101–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NICE. 2004. Online. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/CG013fullguideline.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness O B, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 108: 21–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odlind V, Haqlund B, Pakkanen M, Otterblad Olausson P. Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973 – 2000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica 2003; 82: 516–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qublan H S, Tahat Y. Multiple cesarean section. The impact on maternal and fetal outcome. Saudi Medical Journal 2006; 27: 210–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riskin A, Abend-Weinger M, Riskin-Mashiah S, Kugelman A, Bader D. Cesarean section, gestational age, and transient tachypnea of the newborn: timing is the key. American Journal of Perinatology 2005; 22: 377–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelson B, Pagano M, Conetta L, Goldman B, Vohra N, Frey M, et al. Previous preterm cesarean delivery: identification of a new risk factor for uterine rupture in VBAC candidates. Journal of Maternal-fetal and Neonatal Medicine: the official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 2005; 18: 339–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaans W A, van der Vliet L M, Roell-Schorer E A, Bleker O P, van Roosmalen J. Trial of labour after two or three previous caesarean sections. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2003; 110: 16–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotland N E, Lipschitz L S, Caughey A B. Delivery strategies for women with a previous classic cesarean delivery: a decision analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 187: 1203–1208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutchfield P, Whitaker R, Russell I. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) 2005; 331: 662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Paranjothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Zanardo V, Simbi K A, Vedovato S, Trevisanuto D. The influence of timing of elective cesarean section on neonatal resuscitation risk. Pediatric Critical Care in Medicine 2004; 5: 566–570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar