![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Birthchoice. 2006. Online. Available at: www.birthchoice.org.uk
- Bloomfield T. Caesarean section. NICE Guidelines and management of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 24: 485–490
- Churchill H, Savage W, Francome C. Caesarean birth in Britain. Middlesex University Press, London 2006
- Durand A M. The safety of home birth: the farm study. American Journal of Public Health 1992; 82: 450–452
- FIGO Ethics Committee. Ethical aspects regarding caesarean delivery for non-medical reasons. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999; 64: 317–322
- General Medical Council. Good medical practice. GMC, London, (undated)
- General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. GMC, London 1998
- Independent Midwives Association (IMA). Clinical statistics 2003 – 2004. 2006, Online. Available at: www.independentmidwives.uk/?mod=724
- Leitch C R, Walker J J. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998; 105: 621–626
- Macdonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira P, et al. The Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985; 152: 524–539
- Macones G A, Peipert J, Nelson D B, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 193: 1656–1662
- NICE, National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean section: Clinical Guidelines. RCOG Press, London 2004
- Revill J. Why mothers should be offered caesarean section. The Observer 5 March, 2006
- Roberts L J. Elective section after two sections – where's the evidence?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991; 98: 1199–1202
- Roberts L J, Beardsworth S A, Trew G. Labour following caesarean section: current practice in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1994; 101: 153–155
- Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists. Greentop Guideline: Birth after previous caesarean birth. RCOG Press, London 2007
- Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists. NICE evidence based guidelines on electronic fetal monitoring. RCOG Press, London 2001
- Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists. Clinical Governance Advice. No 6: Obtaining valid consent. RCOG Press, London 2004
- Savage W. Review: the caesarean section epidemic. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000; 20: 223–225
- Savage W, Francome C. British caesarean section rates: have we reached a plateau?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993; 100: 493–406
- Savage W, Francome C. British consultants' attitudes to caesareans. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007; 27: 354–359
- van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers P E. Midwifery in the Netherlands. The Wormerveer study, selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1989; 96: 656–662