References
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Committee Opinion No. 342. Induction of labour for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG, Washington, DC 2006; 108: 465–467
- Guihard P, Blondel B. Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing rates in the future. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 108: 48–55
- Knight M, Kurinczuk J J, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P. The UK Obstetric Surveillance System for rare disorders of pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 263–265
- Landon M B, Hauth J C, Leveno K J, Spong C Y, Leindecker S, Varner M W. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour after prior caesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 351: 281–289
- McDonagh M S, Osterweil P, Guise J M. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 1007–1015
- Moffat M, Bell J, Porter M, Lawten S, Hundley V, Danielian P, et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006; 114: 86–93
- NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Delivering quality and value: Focus on Caesarean section. NHS, London 2006
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit (RCOG CESU). Induction of labour. RCOG, London 2001; 1–78
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green top guideline No. 45: Birth after previous caesarean birth. RCOG Press, London 2007
- Smith J C, Pell J P, Paranjothy D, Dobbie R. Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 2004; 329: 375
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). Clinical Practice Guideline No. 155. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2005; 89: 319–331