![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Beard R J. Unusual presentation of translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Lancet 1981; 1: 837
- Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz B O, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 2003; 8: 150–155
- Kassab B, Audra P. The immigrating intrauterine device: Case report and review of the literature. Contraception Fertilité Sexualité 1999; 27: 696–700
- Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, et al. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory?. Contraception 2002; 66: 105–108
- Sogaard K. Unrecognised perforation of the uterine and rectal walls by an intrauterine contraceptive device. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1993; 72: 55–56
- WHO. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. World Health Organization, Geneva 1987; 48
- Zakin D, Stern W Z, Rosenblatt R. Complete and Partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices: Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 1981; 36: 335–353