Non-diabetic macrosomia: An obstetric dilemma

References

• Abramowicz J S, Sherer D M, Bar-Tov E, Woods J R, Jr. The cheek-to-cheek diameter in the ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 165: 846–852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. Practice Bulletin, No. 22: Fetal macrosomia. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• ACOG. Practice Bulletin, No. 58: Ultrasonography in pregnancy. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 104: 1449–1458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsunnari S, Berger H, Sermer M, Seaward G, Kelly E, Farine D. Obstetric outcome of extreme macrosomia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2005; 27: 323–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Athukorala C, Middleton P, Crowther C A. Intrapartum interventions for preventing shoulder dystocia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006; 4: CD005543
   Google Scholar
• Baker P N, Johnson I R, Gowland P A, Hykin J, Harvey P R, Freeman A, et al. Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1994; 343: 644–645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2004; 32: 113–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethune M, Bell R. Evaluation of the measurement of the fetal fat layer, interventricular septum and abdominal circumference percentile in the prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 22: 586–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet S L, Alexander G R, Salihu H M, Pass M. Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 188: 1372–1378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet S L, Salihu H M, Alexander G R. Mode of delivery and birth outcomes of macrosomic infants. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004; 24: 622–629
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan S P, Grobman W A, Gherman R A, Chauhan V B, Chang G, Magann E F, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005b; 193: 332–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan S P, Lutton P M, Bailey K J, Guerrieri J P, Morrison J C. Intrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients' estimates of newborn birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 79: 956–958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan S P, Rose C H, Gherman R B, Magann E F, Holland M W, Morrison J C. Brachial plexus injury: a 23-year experience from a tertiary center. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005a; 192: 1795–1802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan S P, West D J, Scardo J A, Boyd J M, Joiner J, Hendrix N W. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: cinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 95: 639–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen B F, Penning S, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T. The incidence and severity of shoulder dystocia correlates with a sonographic measurement of asymmetry in patients with diabetes. American Journal of Perinatology 1999; 16: 197–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomarasamy A, Connock M, Thornton J, Khan K S. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 1461–1466
   Google Scholar
• Ecker J L, Greenberg J A, Norwitz E R, Nadel A S, Repke J T. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 89: 643–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg H M, Mercer B M, Catalano P M. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 191: 964–968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott J P, Garite T J, Freeman R K, McQuown D S, Patel J M. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982; 60: 159–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gherman R B, Goodwin T M, Ouzounian J G, Miller D A, Paul R H. Brachial plexus palsy associated with cesarean section: an in utero injury. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 177: 1162–1164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gherman R B, Ouzounian J G, Goodwin T M. Brachial plexus palsy: An in utero injury. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999; 180: 1303–1307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilby J R, Williams M C, Spellacy W N. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia: a risk factor for shoulder dystocia. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2000; 45: 936–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg N A, Moisidis C. How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001; 184: 1427–1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson S, Henningsson A C, Lindqvist P. Correlation of birth injury with maternal height and birthweight. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 764–767
   Google Scholar
• Hedriana H L, Moore T R. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 170: 1600–1606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrichs C, Magann E F, Brantley K L, Crews J H, Sanderson M, Chauhan S P. Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2003; 48: 339–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst M A. Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: A cost-effectiveness analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 193: 1035–1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irion O, Boulvain M. Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000; 2: CD000938
   Google Scholar
• Jolly M C, Sebire N J, Harris J P, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2003; 111: 9–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen A, de Valk H W, Visser G H. Sibling birth weight as a predictor of macrosomia in women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 1743–1748
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landon M B, Mintz M C, Gabbe S G. Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: predictor of the large-for-gestational-age infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989; 160: 115–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D F, Raymond R C, Perkins M B, Brooks G G, Heymann A R. Recurrence rate of shoulder dystocia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995; 172: 1369–1371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony R, Walsh C, Foley M E, Daly L, O'Herlihy C. Outcome of second delivery after prior macrosomic infant in women with normal glucose tolerance. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 107: 857–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazouni C, Porcu G, Cohen-Solal E, Heckenroth H, Guidicelli B, Bonnier P, et al. Maternal and anthropomorphic risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006; 85: 567–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller R F, Johnson E B, Devine P. Sonographic fetal symmetry predicts shoulder dystocia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 193: S45
   Google Scholar
• Mocanu E V, Greene R A, Byrne B M, Turner M J. Obstetric and neonatal outcome of babies weighing more than 4.5 kg: An analysis by parity. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2000; 92: 229–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongelli M, Benzie R. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: A comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 26: 500–503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States, 1990. Vol I. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Hyattsville, MD 1994
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly-Green C, Divon M. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 43: 309–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwude J L, Rao S, Selo-Ojeme D O. Large babies and unplanned Caesarean delivery. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2005; 118: 36–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Buttarelli M, Franchi M, Durig P, et al. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: An analysis of 3356 cases. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2003; 109: 160–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCOG. Guideline No. 42: Shoulder dystocia. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Resnick R. Management of shoulder dystocia girdle. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980; 23: 559–564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricart W, Lopez J, Mozas J, Pericot A, Sancho M A, Gonzalez N, , Spanish Group for the Study of the impact of Carpenter and Coustan GDM thresholds, et al. Body mass index has a greater impact on pregnancy outcomes than gestational hyperglycaemia. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 1736–1742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santolaya-Forgas J, Meyer W J, Gauthier D W, Kahn D. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: An ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 171: 1072–1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild R L, Fimmers R, Hansmann M. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 16: 445–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simhayoff N, Sheiner E, Levy A, Hammel R D, Mazor M, Hallak M. To induce or not to induce labor: a macrosomic dilemma. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2004; 58: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood A K, Yancey M, Richards D. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using humeral soft tissue thickness. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995; 85: 937–940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotland N E, Caughey A B, Breed E M, Escobar G J. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2004a; 87: 220–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotland N E, Hopkins L M, Caughey A B. Gestational weight gain, macrosomia, and risk of cesarean birth in nondiabetic nulliparas. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004b; 104: 671–677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surkan P J, Hsieh C C, Johansson A L, Dickman P W, Cnattingius S. Reasons for increasing trends in large for gestational age births. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 104: 720–726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamorski M A, Biggs W S. Management of suspected fetal macrosomia. American Family Physician 2001; 63: 302–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar