![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk N. Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 1997; 73: 1–4
- Bais J, Van Der Borden D, Pel M, Bonsel G, Eskes M, Van Der Slikke H, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2001; 96: 158–162
- Chamberlain G, Patel N. The future of the maternity services. RCOG Press, London 1994
- Department of Health. Changing childbirth Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London 1993
- Emmett C, Murphy D, Patel R, Fahey T, Jones C, Ricketts I, et al. Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expectations 2007; 10: 161–172
- Emmett C, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy D. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006; 113: 1438–1445
- Groom K, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk N. Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2002; 100: 185–188
- Landon M, Hauth J, Leveno K, Spong C, Leindecker S, Varner M, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 351: 2581–2589
- Macdonald C, Pinion S, Macleod U. Scottish female obstetricians' views on elective caesarean section and personal choice for delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002; 22: 586–589
- Mackenzie I, Bradley S, Embrey M. Vaginal prostaglandins and labour induction for patients previously delivered by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1984; 91: 7–10
- Morrison J, Mackenzie I Z. Caesarean section on demand. Seminars in perinatology, M E D'Alton, I Gross. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2003; 20–33
- Murphy D, Stirrat G, Heron J. The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies. Human Reproduction 2002; 17: 1914–1917
- NHS Institute of Innovation and Improvement. Delivering quality and value: focus on caesarean section. Department of Health, London 2005; 1–46
- Raheem M, Salloum M. Clinical audit: obstetric performance after caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003; 23: 503–506
- RCOG. Why Mothers Die 1997–1999. The Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press, London 2001
- RCOG. Why Mothers Die 2000–2002. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press, London 2004
- Sur S, Mackenzie I. Does discussion of possible scar rupture influence preferred mode of delivery after a caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 25: 338–341
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press, London 2001