An audit of standards of the ‘see and treat’ approach in women with a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Pap smears

References

• Balasubramani L, Orbell S, Hagger M, Brown V, Tidy J. Do women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007; 114: 39–45
   Google Scholar
• Bigrigg M A, Codling B W, Pearson P, Read M D, Swingler G R. Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Experience of low-voltage diathermy loop in 1000 patients 1990; 336: 229–231, Lancet
   Google Scholar
• Chan K K, Tam K F, Tse K Y, Ngan H Y. The use of vaginal antimicrobial after large loop excision of transformation zone: a prospective randomised trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007; 114: 970–976
   Google Scholar
• Chan K S, Kwok C W, Yu K M, Sin S Y, Tang L C. A three-year review of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with large loop excision of the transformation zone. Hong Kong Medical Journal 1997; 3: 21–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Khunamornpong S, Suprasert P, Phongnarisorn C, et al. A ‘see and treat’ approach for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology. Journal of Medical Association of Thailand 2004; 87: 865–868
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chia K V, Scarffe R J, Sobowale O A. Is it efficacious to use large loop excision of the transformation zone for ‘diagnosis and treatment in one procedure’ in the management of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1994; 14: 111–113
   Google Scholar
• Crane J M. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 102: 1058–1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn T S, Burke M, Shwayder J. A ‘see and treat’ management for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion pap smears. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2003; 7: 104–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn T S, Killoran K, Wolf D. Complications of outpatient LLETZ procedures. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2004; 49: 76–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Errington C A, Roberts M, Tindle P, Michael E, Bulmer J N, Wadehra V. Colposcopic management of high-grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting ‘see and treat’?. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 339–347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferris D G, Hainer B L, Pfenninger J L, Zuber T J. ‘See and treat’ electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Journal of Family Practice 1996; 42: 253–257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foden-Shroff J, Redman C W, Tucker H, Millinship J, Thomas E, Warwick A, et al. Do routine antibiotics after loop diathermy excision reduce morbidity?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998; 105: 1022–1025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giuliani B, Periti E, Mecacci F. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in obstetric and gynecological surgery. Journal of Chemotherapy 1999; 11: 577–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornall R J, Beynon D W, Shepherd N J, Boyd I E. Topical antiseptic agent after large loop excision of the transformation zone: results of a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999; 19: 509–510
   Google Scholar
• Irvin W P, Jr, Andersen W A, Taylor P T, Jr, Stoler M H, Rice L W. ‘See-and-treat’ loop electrosurgical excision. Has the time come for a reassessment?. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2002; 47: 569–574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keijser K G, Kenemans P, van der Zanden P H, Schijf C P, Vooijs G P, Rolland R. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 166: 1281–1287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Khobjai A, Chandacham A, Tucksinsook U. Complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia: a prospective study. Journal of Medical Association of Thailand 2006; 89: 583–587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Khunamornpong S, Siriaunkgul S, Sukkawattananon W. How can the overtreatment rate of ‘see and treat’ approach be reduced in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology?. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2007; 8: 206–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Ratchusiri K. Clinicopathologic predictors of incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical preneoplasia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2005; 6: 481–484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luesley D, Leeson S. Colposcopy and Programme Management. Guideline for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. NHSCSP, Sheffield 2004, NHSCSP Publication No.20
   Google Scholar
• Numnum T M, Kirby T O, Leath C A, 3rd, Huh W K, Alvarez R D, Straughn J M, Jr. A prospective evaluation of ‘see and treat’ in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2005; 9: 2–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadan O, Yarden H, Schejter E, Bilevsky E, Bachar R, Lurie S. Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a ‘see and treat’ versus a three-step approach. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007; 131: 73–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasieni P, Adams J. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model. British Medical Journal 1999; 318: 1244–1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M C, Broadhead T J, Hammond R H. See and treat at colposcopy-achieving the standard. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001; 21: 62–63
   Google Scholar
• Szurkus D C, Harrison T A. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 188: 1180–1182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright T C, Jr, Massad L S, Dunton C J, Spitzer M, Wilkinson E J, Solomon D. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 197: 346–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar