Prognostic value of hysterosalpingography after salpingostomy in patients with hydrosalpinx

References

• Aboulghar, M. A., Mansour, R. T. and Serour, G. I., 1998. Controversies in the modern management of hydrosalpinx. Human Reproduction Update, 4 (6), 882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajonuma, L. C., Ng, E. H. Y. and Chan, H. C., 2002. New insights into the mechanisms underlying hydrosalpinx fluid formation and its adverse effect on IVF outcome. Human Reproduction Update, 8 (3), 255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audebert, A. and Pouly, J.L., 2014. Laparoscopic surgery for distal tubal occlusions: lessons learned from a historical series of 434 cases. Fertility and Sterility, 102 (3), e74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., et al., 2015. Salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 30 (8), 1882–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., Almog, B. and Tulandi, T., 2018. Hydrosalpinx sclerotherapy before in vitro fertilization: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 25 (4), 600–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, K., et al., 2017. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376 (21), 2043–2052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunson, D.B., Baird, D.D. and Colombo, B., 2004. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 103 (1), 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomel, V., 2015. The place of reconstructive tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive techniques. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 31 (6), 722–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomel, V. and Wang, I., 1994. Laparoscopic surgery for infertility therapy. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 6 (2), 141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harb, H.M., et al., 2019. Hydrosalpinx and pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 38 (3), 427–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, X., et al., 2018. Effect of interventional embolization treatment for hydrosalpinx on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Medicine, 97 (48), e13143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, R.P.S., 1980. Surgery-pregnancy time intervals after salpingolysis, unilateral salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingostomy. Fertility and Sterility, 34 (3), 222–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.V., Montoya, I.A. and Olive, D.L., 1992. Ethiodol oil contrast medium inhibits macrophage phagocytosis and adherence by altering membrane electronegativity and microviscosity. Fertility and Sterility, 58 (3), 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juneau, C. and Bates, G.W., 2012. Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55 (2), 455–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katler, Q., Pflugner, L. and Martinez, A., 2018. Management of bilateral ectopic pregnancies after ovulation induction using unilateral salpingectomy and methotrexate for the remaining ectopic with subsequent intrauterine pregnancy. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 7539713–7539714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mage, G., et al., 1986. A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery. Fertility and Sterility, 46 (5), 807–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K.Y.B. and Cheong, Y., 2019. Hydrosalpinx – Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 59, 41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.T., et al., 2017. Clinical characteristics of genital chlamydia infection in pelvic inflammatory disease. BMC Women’s Health, 17 (1), 5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radoń-Pokracka, M., et al., 2019. Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes at advanced maternal age. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 7 (12), 1951–1956.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, W.L., Beitia, L.G. and Mester, J., 2006. Hysterosalpingography: A Reemerging Study. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 26 (2), 419–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, V., Li, T. C. and Cooke, I. D., 1991. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 98 (7), 628–636.
   Google Scholar
• Strandell, A., 2000. The influence of hydrosalpinx on IVF and embryo transfer: a review. Human Reproduction Update, 6 (4), 387–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A. and Lindhard, A., 2002. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility?: The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 17 (5), 1141–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, A., et al., 2001. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 16 (11), 2403–2410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., et al., 2011. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 284 (1), 31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, B., et al., 2017. Pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization after Essure and laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 108 (1), 84–95.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yohannes, E., et al., 2019. The human tubal lavage proteome reveals biological processes that may govern the pathology of hydrosalpinx. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 8980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar